Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28133789›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

Diagnostic performance of procalcitonin, presepsin, and C-reactive protein in patients with hematological malignancies.

Yasuhiro Ebihara, Kiyoko Kobayashi, Akaru Ishida, Tomoya Maeda, Naoki Takahashi, Yoshitada Taji, Norio Asou, Kenji Ikebuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Utility of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as predictors of Gram-negative bacteremia in febrile hematological outpatients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yasuhiro EbiharaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9883-6986
Kiyoko KobayashiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Akaru IshidaDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Transplantation, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Tomoya MaedaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Naoki TakahashiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshitada TajiClinical Laboratory, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Norio AsouDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Kenji IkebuchiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInfections represent a major complication of hematological malignancies. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been used as diagnostic biomarkers of infections, but do not produce definitive findings. Recently, a new biomarker, presepsin, has been used as a diagnostic tool for detecting infections in the fields of emergency and neonatal medicine. However, the usefulness of presepsin for identifying infections in patients with hematological malignancies, including those who develop febrile neutropenia, remains unclear.

methodsIn this study, we retrospectively analyzed the utility of PCT, presepsin, and CRP as biomarkers of infections during 49 febrile episodes that occurred in 28 patients with hematological malignancies.

resultsThe levels of PCT, but not those of CRP or presepsin, were significantly higher in the infection group than in the uninfected group (P<.03), indicating that PCT might be a more sensitive biomarker of infections. No differences in presepsin levels were detected between the patients with and without neutropenia, or between the infected and uninfected patients with neutropenia, indicating that presepsin might have less diagnostic value in patients with neutropenia.

conclusionsWe conclude that PCT might provide additional information and could be used in combination with other biomarkers to detect infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCalcitoninChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInfectionsLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMaleMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersCalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsPeptide Fragmentspresepsin protein, humanC-reactive proteinhematological malignancyneutropeniapresepsinprocalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID28133789
PMCPMC6817173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.