ArticleIrish journal of medical science2017
Prescribing error at hospital discharge: a retrospective review of medication information in an Irish hospital.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proactive risk assessment and nursing risk management in chemotherapy drugs: FMECA methodology results.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2026Article
- Swaying Information About Care: Information-Sharing Challenges in Transitional Care of Older Adults in Japan.Journal of cross-cultural gerontology · 2026Article
- Impact of the Clinical Pharmacist in Rheumatology Practice: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the impact of the addition of a heart failure prescribing pharmacist to consultant-led heart failure ward round at a tertiary hospital.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023Article
- The impact of an in-department pharmacist on the prevention of drug iatrogenesis in a rheumatology department.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
- The Patient-Held Active Record of Medication Status (PHARMS) study: a mixed-methods feasibility analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019Article
- A new approach of assessing patient safety aspects in routine practice using the example of "doctors handwritten prescriptions".Journal of clinical nursing · 2019Article
- Operating a patient medicines helpline: a survey study exploring current practice in England using the RE-AIM evaluation framework.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- The PHARMS (Patient Held Active Record of Medication Status) feasibility study: a research proposal.BMC research notes · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrescribing error may result in adverse clinical outcomes leading to increased patient morbidity, mortality and increased economic burden. Many errors occur during transitional care as patients move between different stages and settings of care.
aimTo conduct a review of medication information and identify prescribing error among an adult population in an urban hospital.
methodsRetrospective review of medication information was conducted. Part 1: an audit of discharge prescriptions which assessed: legibility, compliance with legal requirements, therapeutic errors (strength, dose and frequency) and drug interactions. Part 2: A review of all sources of medication information (namely pre-admission medication list, drug Kardex, discharge prescription, discharge letter) for 15 inpatients to identify unintentional prescription discrepancies, defined as: "undocumented and/or unjustified medication alteration" throughout the hospital stay.
resultsPart 1: of the 5910 prescribed items; 53 (0.9%) were deemed illegible. Of the controlled drug prescriptions 11.1% (n = 167) met all the legal requirements. Therapeutic errors occurred in 41% of prescriptions (n = 479) More than 1 in 5 patients (21.9%) received a prescription containing a drug interaction. Part 2: 175 discrepancies were identified across all sources of medication information; of which 78 were deemed unintentional. Of these: 10.2% (n = 8) occurred at the point of admission, whereby 76.9% (n = 60) occurred at the point of discharge.
conclusionsThe study identified the time of discharge as a point at which prescribing errors are likely to occur. This has implications for patient safety and provider work load in both primary and secondary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28133713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.