ArticleJournal of materials chemistry. B2016
Approaches for building bioactive elements into synthetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Article in Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Synthetic Blocks for Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics insights into bone tissue injury and healing: bridging orthopedic trauma and regenerative medicine.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Correction to "Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration".ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Biomimetic Platform for Bone Tissue Regeneration.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- Recent development in multizonal scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Three-Dimensional-Bioprinted Bioactive Glass/Cellulose Composite Scaffolds with Porous Structure towards Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2023Article
- Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Osteoregenerative efficacy of a novel synthetic, resorbable Ca/P/S-based bone graft substitute in intra- and peri-articular fractures: a brief medical image-based report.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Porous Chitosan/Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Bone Scaffold Prepared by Microwave Foaming Method.Polymers · 2022Article
- Article
- Interaction of alginate with nano-hydroxyapatite-collagen using strontium provides suitable osteogenic platform.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Article
- Precise Tuning of Polymeric Fiber Dimensions to Enhance the Mechanical Properties of Alginate Hydrogel Matrices.Polymers · 2021Article
- Bone Matrix Non-Collagenous Proteins in Tissue Engineering: Creating New Bone by Mimicking the Extracellular Matrix.Polymers · 2021Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Biomaterials: Scaffolds for Stem Cell Control.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Review
- Design of Bio-Conjugated Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine Applications: From Polymer Scaffold to Biomolecule Choice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2020Review
- The mineralization, drug release andRSC advances · 2020Article
- Modular Strategies to Build Cell-Free and Cell-Laden Scaffolds towards Bioengineered Tissues and Organs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- [Recent research progress of bioactivity mechanism and application of bone repair materials].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is emerging as a possible solution for regeneration of bone in a number of applications. For effective utilization, BTE scaffolds often need modifications to impart biological cues that drive diverse cellular functions such as adhesion, migration, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and biomineralization. This review provides an outline of various approaches for building bioactive elements into synthetic scaffolds for BTE and classifies them broadly under two distinct schemes; namely, the top-down approach and the bottom-up approach. Synthetic and natural routes for top-down approaches to production of bioactive constructs for BTE, such as generation of scaffold-extracellular matrix (ECM) hybrid constructs or decellularized and demineralized scaffolds, are provided. Similarly, traditional scaffold-based bottom-up approaches, including growth factor immobilization or peptide-tethered scaffolds, are provided. Finally, a brief overview of emerging bottom-up approaches for generating biologically active constructs for BTE is given. A discussion of the key areas for further investigation, challenges, and opportunities is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.