Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28132876›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2017

Study protocol: The Technology-Enhanced Coaching (TEC) program to improve diabetes outcomes - A randomized controlled trial.

Michele Heisler, Rebecca Mase, Brianne Brown, Shayla Wilson, Pamela J Reeves

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michele HeislerCenter for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor VA, HSR&D, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Rebecca MaseCenter for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor VA, HSR&D, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: rmase@umich.edu.
Brianne BrownCenter for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor VA, HSR&D, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Shayla WilsonCenter for Clinical Management Research Ann Arbor VA, HSR&D, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Pamela J ReevesJohn D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI, United States.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Racial and ethnic minority adults with diabetes living in under-resourced communities face multiple barriers to sustaining self-management behaviors necessary to improve diabetes outcomes. Peer support and decision support tools each have been associated with improved diabetes outcomes. Methods: 290 primarily African American adults with poor glycemic control were recruited from the Detroit Veteran's Administration Hospital and randomized to Technology-Enhanced Coaching (TEC) or Peer Coaching alone. Participants in both arms were assigned a peer coach trained in autonomy-supportive approaches. Coaches are diabetes patients with prior poor glycemic control who now have good control. Participants met face-to-face initially with their coach to review diabetes education materials and develop an action plan. Educational materials in the TEC arm are delivered via a web-based, educational tool tailored with each participant's personalized health data (iDecide). Over six months, coaches call their assigned participants once a week to provide support for weekly action steps. Data are also collected on an Observational Control group with no contact with study staff. Changes in A1c, blood pressure, other patient-centered outcomes and mediators and moderators of intervention effects will be assessed. Results: 290 participants were enrolled. Discussion: Tailored e-Health tools with educational content may enhance the effectiveness of peer coaching programs to better prepare patients to set self-management goals, identify action plans, and discuss treatment options with their health care providers. The study will provide insights for scalable self-management support programs for diabetes and chronic illnesses that require high levels of sustained patient self-management.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2MentoringPatient Education as TopicPeer GroupAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBlood PressureFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInternetMaleMedication AdherenceMichiganGlycated HemoglobinDecision aidDiabetesHealth coachingPeer-supportSelf-managementTrial registration:The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT01855399.

Identifiers

PMID28132876
PMCPMC5510884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.