Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28132648›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017

Experimental validation of contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR for quantification of myocardium at risk in acute myocardial infarction.

David Nordlund, Mikael Kanski, Robert Jablonowski, Sasha Koul, David Erlinge, Marcus Carlsson, Henrik Engblom, Anthony H Aletras, Håkan Arheden

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The significance of ST-elevation in aVL in anterolateral myocardial infarction: An assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  9. Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ischemic QRS prolongation as a biomarker of myocardial injury in STEMI patients.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  13. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Quantification of both the area-at-risk and acute myocardial infarct size in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using T1-mapping.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
  16. The severity of post-infarction edema suggests a bimodal pattern, whereas the extent does not.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David NordlundDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-8459
Mikael KanskiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Robert JablonowskiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sasha KoulDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
David ErlingeDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Marcus CarlssonDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik EngblomDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Anthony H AletrasDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan ArhedenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. hakan.arheden@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of myocardium at risk (MaR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is necessary when assessing myocardial salvage. Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) is a recently developed cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) method for assessment of MaR up to 1 week after AMI. Our aim was to validate CE-SSFP for determination of MaR in an experimental porcine model using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) as a reference standard and to test the stability of MaR-quantification over time after injecting gadolinium-based contrast.

methodsEleven pigs were subjected to either 35 or 40 min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery followed by six hours of reperfusion. A technetium-based perfusion tracer was administered intravenously ten minutes before reperfusion. In-vivo and ex-vivo CE-SSFP CMR was performed followed by ex-vivo MPS imaging. MaR was expressed as % of left ventricular mass (LVM).

resultsThere was good agreement between MaR by ex-vivo CMR and MaR by MPS (bias: 1 ± 3% LVM, r

conclusionsContrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR can be used to measure MaR, both in vivo and ex vivo, in a porcine model with good accuracy and precision over the first 30 min after contrast injection. This offers the option to use the less complex ex-vivo imaging when determining myocardial salvage in experimental studies.

Indexed as

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAnimalsContrast MediaDisease Models, AnimalHeterocyclic CompoundsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingMyocardiumOrganometallic CompoundsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSus scrofaContrast Mediagadolinium 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetateHeterocyclic CompoundsOrganometallic CompoundsAARArea at riskCE-SSFPMyocardium at risk

Identifiers

PMID28132648
PMCPMC5278574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.