Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28132117›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Evaluation of antimicrobial persistent activity of alcohol-based hand antiseptics against bacterial contamination.

R M López-Gigosos, E Mariscal-López, M Gutierrez-Bedmar, A García-Rodriguez, A Mariscal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R M López-GigososDepartment of Public Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Malaga University, Avenue Louis Pasteur, 12, Campus Teatinos, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
E Mariscal-LópezDepartment of Public Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Malaga University, Avenue Louis Pasteur, 12, Campus Teatinos, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
M Gutierrez-BedmarDepartment of Public Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Malaga University, Avenue Louis Pasteur, 12, Campus Teatinos, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
A García-RodriguezDepartment of Public Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Malaga University, Avenue Louis Pasteur, 12, Campus Teatinos, 29071, Malaga, Spain.
A MariscalDepartment of Public Health and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Malaga University, Avenue Louis Pasteur, 12, Campus Teatinos, 29071, Malaga, Spain. mariscal@uma.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-2161
Universidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate persistent activity of three alcohol-based antiseptics widely used in the clinical routine containing chlorhexidine, triclosan or mecetronium after hand disinfection. Four tests were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics on: (i) resident microbiota; (ii) nutrient agar plates (NAP) subsequently inoculated with a test organism; and transient microbiota acquired by contact with dry hands (iii), or (iv) a wet inert surface that had been artificially contaminated. Four reference strains (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis) and an Acinetobacter baumannii strain responsible for a hospital outbreak were used as transient microbiota. Antimicrobial activity was calculated according to the CFUs reduction by reference to non-disinfected control hands. The antiseptics were applied according to European Standard EN1500. Solutions containing chlorhexidine or triclosan showed some persistent effects on transient microbiota on inert humid surfaces and NAP, but not on contaminated dry hands. Solutions containing mecetronium showed no persistent effect on transient flora in any of the trials. All alcohol-based antiseptics tested were more effective against resident flora than soap. No persistent activity was observed for A. baumannii in any of the trials. Chlorhexidine and triclosan are preferred when an antiseptic with persistent activity is desired, but a moist environment appears to be necessary for that antibacterial activity. Accordingly, relevant conclusions regarding the persistent activity of antiseptics for clinical practice and protection against bacterial contamination cannot be derived from this study for the alcoholic solutions tested.

Indexed as

AlcoholsBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialHandHand SanitizersHumansVolunteersAlcoholsHand Sanitizers

Identifiers

PMID28132117
OpenAlexW2582065032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.