ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
Long-term outcome after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Quality of Life of Braun Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Reconstruction in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Short-term outcomes of robotic distal gastrectomy with the "preemptive retropancreatic approach": a propensity score matching analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- Outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Digestive tract reconstruction of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparison of the intracorporeal overlap, intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis, and extracorporeal anastomosis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Linear or circular stapler? A propensity score-matched, multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Comparison of total versus subtotal gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2019Article
- Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Review
- Circular versus linear stapling in esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite its spread and advances, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes and to identify the potential risk factors for recurrence and survival after LG in AGC patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe medical records of patients who underwent radical LG for histopathologically diagnosed stage IB or more advanced gastric cancer from 2004 to 2012 were collected. The clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.
resultsLG was performed for 300 patients, with a median operative time of 278 min and blood loss of 46 ml. Postoperative morbidity was defined as Clavien-Dindo grades III and IV and occurred in 13 patients (6.3%) in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group. The pathologic stage was IB in 109 patients (36.3%), IIA in 77 patients (25.7%), IIB in 48 patients (16.0%), IIIA in 31 patients (10.3%), IIIB in 19 patients (6.3%), and IIIC in 16 patients (5.3%). Median follow-up period was 55.2 months. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 92.7% for stage IB, 87.0% for IIA, 68.8% for IIB, 64.5% for IIIA, 47.4% for IIIB, and 43.8% for IIIC. The 5-year actual overall survival rate was 91.1% for stage IB, 72.7% for II, and 62.5% for III. Multivariate analysis revealed postoperative complication as an independent risk factor for RFS.
conclusionLG for AGC was feasible and provided comparable oncologic outcomes with those previously reported. Postoperative complications correlated with poor prognosis. Randomized control trials should be conducted to confirm these results of LG for AGC in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.