Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28132088›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017

Long-term outcome after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.

Hiroshi Kawase, Yuma Ebihara, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Fumitaka Nakamura, Katsuhiko Murakawa, Takayuki Morita, Shunichi Okushiba, Satoshi Hirano

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi KawaseDepartment of Surgery, Sapporo Kiyota Hospital, Shinei 1-1-1-1, Kiyota-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. hkawase@opal.plala.or.jp.
Yuma EbiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North-15, West-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toshiaki ShichinoheDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North-15, West-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Fumitaka NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Maeda 1-12-1-40, Teine-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsuhiko MurakawaDepartment of Surgery, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, West-6, South-8, Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takayuki MoritaDepartment of Surgery, Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital, Honcho 1-1, Higashi-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shunichi OkushibaDepartment of Surgery, Tonan Hospital, North-1, West-6, Chuou-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North-15, West-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPHokkaido hospital · JPHokkaido Sapporo Kiyota High School · JPObihiro Kosei General Hospital · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JPTonan Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite its spread and advances, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes and to identify the potential risk factors for recurrence and survival after LG in AGC patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe medical records of patients who underwent radical LG for histopathologically diagnosed stage IB or more advanced gastric cancer from 2004 to 2012 were collected. The clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were evaluated retrospectively.

resultsLG was performed for 300 patients, with a median operative time of 278 min and blood loss of 46 ml. Postoperative morbidity was defined as Clavien-Dindo grades III and IV and occurred in 13 patients (6.3%) in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group. The pathologic stage was IB in 109 patients (36.3%), IIA in 77 patients (25.7%), IIB in 48 patients (16.0%), IIIA in 31 patients (10.3%), IIIB in 19 patients (6.3%), and IIIC in 16 patients (5.3%). Median follow-up period was 55.2 months. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 92.7% for stage IB, 87.0% for IIA, 68.8% for IIB, 64.5% for IIIA, 47.4% for IIIB, and 43.8% for IIIC. The 5-year actual overall survival rate was 91.1% for stage IB, 72.7% for II, and 62.5% for III. Multivariate analysis revealed postoperative complication as an independent risk factor for RFS.

conclusionLG for AGC was feasible and provided comparable oncologic outcomes with those previously reported. Postoperative complications correlated with poor prognosis. Randomized control trials should be conducted to confirm these results of LG for AGC in the general population.

Indexed as

GastrectomyLaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateActual survivalAdvanced gastric cancerLaparoscopic gastrectomyPostoperative complicationsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28132088
OpenAlexW2581339941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.