ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2016
The Development of Extremely Premature Infants.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Completeness of Retention Data and Determinants of Attrition in Birth Cohorts of Very Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- The Survival of Extremely Premature Neonates in Perinatal Care Centers of Different Care Levels: An Analysis from the German Federal States of Thuringia and Saxony.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Article
- Family perceptions of prematurity, neurodevelopment, and early intervention: a qualitative study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- The relationship between neonatal stress in preterm infants and developmental outcomes at the corrected age of 24-30 months.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- 17-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate for the Prevention of Recurrent Preterm Birth - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Taking into Account the PROLONG Trial.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
- Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Review
- Estimating Outcome-Exposure Associations when Exposure Biomarker Detection Limits vary Across Batches.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- The Causes and Prevention of Symptoms in Premature Babies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUntil now, there has been no comprehensive long-term study in Germany on the development of extremely premature infants up to school age.
methodsFrom October 2004 to September 2008, in the German federal state of Lower Saxony, 437 infants born at a gestational age less than 28 weeks were followed up at the ages of 2 and 5 years, and some at the age of 10 years. The 5-year follow-up data were collated with the peri- and neonatological parameters and compared with the 2- and 10-year follow-up data.
resultsThe mortality of extremely premature infants was 25.1%. Among the five-year-olds studied, 14.1% showed cognitive impairment and 17.4% had cerebral palsy. 40.4% manifested abnormalities of speech or language, 33.1% had behavioral abnormalities, and 72.5% received therapeutic interventions. Infants in whom severe brain damage was diagnosed by ultrasonography shortly after birth were more likely to develop cerebral palsy (odds ratio [OR] 38.28, 99% confidence interval [12.55; 116.80]) and to have impaired cognitive development (OR 7.36 [2.52; 21.51]). The likelihood of cognitive impairment was also higher among infants whose mothers had a lower level of education (OR 3.83 [1.68; 8.77]). 73.1% (242 out of 331) of the two-year-olds were in the same category of cognitive function at the 5-year follow-up; 82.4% (65 out of 79) of the 5-year-olds were in the same category of cognitive function at the 10-year follow-up.
conclusionMany of these extremely premature infants had developmental disturbances, and many required therapeutic interventions. The risk factors revealed by this study may help identify patients who are in particular need of support, enabling targeted measures to be taken at the earliest possible stage in order to improve their cognitive and motor abilities. Nationwide, standardized follow-up at the age of 5 years would be desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.