Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130796›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2017

The effects of restaurant menu calorie labeling on hypothetical meal choices of females with disordered eating.

Ann F Haynos, Christina A Roberto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Messages Promoting Healthy Kids' Meals: An Online RCT.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Difficulties with positive emotion regulation in anorexia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The calorie counter-intuitive effect of restaurant menu calorie labelling.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann F HaynosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-1731
Christina A RobertoDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-9309
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Penn Roybal Center on Behavioral Economics and Health: Solving for Scale and Impact with Design Thinking, Digital Platforms, and Dynamic AdaptationP30AG034546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Alison Meredith Buttenheim · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
Evaluating the effect of brief interventions on effort to restrict dietary intakeF31MH097450 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2013 to 2014
$35k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034546NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH097450NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns have been raised that obesity public policy measures may have harmful effects on individuals with eating disorders. However, little research has investigated this topic. We examined the impact of a popular obesity public policy, menu calorie labeling, on hypothetical food choices of women with disordered eating. Seven hundred sixteen adult females completed an online survey in which they were randomly assigned to receive a restaurant menu with or without calorie information listed. Participants selected foods representative of a meal they would choose to consume and answered questions on restaurant ordering and menu labeling. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (Fairburn & Beglin, ) to assess global eating pathology. Diagnoses of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge-eating disorder (BED) were also derived from this measure. Generalized linear modeling examined the impact of menu label condition, disordered eating, and the menu label by disordered eating interaction on hypothetical food selection and related variables. When disordered eating was examined continuously, menu labeling did not differentially affect food selections of those with elevated disordered eating (p = .45). However, when examined by eating disorder diagnosis, participants with AN or BN ordered significantly fewer (p < .001) and participants with BED ordered significantly more (p = .001) calories in the menu label versus no label condition. Menu labeling may decrease the calories ordered among individuals with AN or BN and increase calories ordered among individuals with BED.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesRestaurantsAdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaBinge-Eating DisorderBulimia NervosaChoice BehaviorConsumer Health InformationEatingEnergy IntakeFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMealsObesityanorexia nervosabinge-eating disorderbulimia nervosaobesity preventionpublic policy

Identifiers

PMID28130796
PMCPMC5378635
OpenAlexW2581106522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.