Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130787›Full record

SynthesisActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2017

Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review.

Niels Lynøe, Göran Elinder, Boubou Hallberg, Måns Rosén, Pia Sundgren, Anders Eriksson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04568538 (The Effect of a Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention Program on Turkish Mothers' Awareness and Knowledge), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04568538 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Shaken Baby Syndrome Prevention Program on Turkish Mothers' Awareness and Knowledge: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAkdeniz UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled87ConditionsShaken Baby Syndrome, MothersArmsTraining program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Addressing the oversight medical cases in low-middle-income countries: poor mention of shaken baby syndrome in Nigeria; reasons, challenges, and recommendations.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Characteristics and associations of ocular and non-ocular manifestations of shaken baby syndrome.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Animal models of pediatric abusive head trauma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Answer to Lynøe: Interesting data about confessions and abusive head trauma, but suboptimal analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children in Japan.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  13. Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  14. Response to Colombari et al. (2021).International journal of legal medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niels LynøeStockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Göran ElinderDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Boubou HallbergDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Måns RosénDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pia SundgrenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anders ErikssonDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Forensic Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shaken baby syndrome has typically been associated with findings of subdural haematoma, retinal haemorrhages and encephalopathy, which are referred to as the triad. During the last decade, however, the certainty with which the triad can indicate that an infant has been violently shaken has been increasingly questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the triad in detecting that an infant had been shaken. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to October 15, 2015. Relevant publications were assessed for the risk of bias using the QUADAS tool and were classified as having a low, moderate or high risk of bias according to predefined criteria. The reference standards were confessions or witnessed cases of shaking or accidents. The search generated 3773 abstracts, 1064 were assessed as possibly relevant and read as full texts, and 30 studies were ultimately included. Of these, 28 were assessed as having a high risk of bias, which was associated with methodological shortcomings as well as circular reasoning when classifying shaken baby cases and controls. The two studies with a moderate risk of bias used confessions and convictions when classifying shaken baby cases, but their different designs made a meta-analysis impossible. None of the studies had a low risk of bias.

conclusionThe systematic review indicates that there is insufficient scientific evidence on which to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the triad in identifying traumatic shaking (very low-quality evidence). It was also demonstrated that there is limited scientific evidence that the triad and therefore its components can be associated with traumatic shaking (low-quality evidence).

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsHumansShaken Baby SyndromeEncephalopathyRetinal haemorrhage‘Shaken baby syndrome’Subdural haematomaTriad

Identifiers

PMID28130787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.