Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130719›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2017

Inspectors' ethical challenges in health care regulation: a pilot study.

W Seekles, G Widdershoven, P Robben, G van Dalfsen, B Molewijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

W SeeklesMedical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ws@uvh.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-0689
G WiddershovenMedical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P RobbenThe Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), Stadsplateau 1, 3521 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
G van DalfsenThe Health Care Inspectorate (IGZ), Stadsplateau 1, 3521 AZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B MolewijkMedical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre (EMGO+), Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing body of research on what kind of ethical challenges health care professionals experience regarding the quality of care. In the Netherlands the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate is responsible for monitoring and regulating the quality of health care. No research exists on what kind of ethical challenges inspectors experience during the regulation process itself. In a pilot study we used moral case deliberation as method in order to reflect upon inspectors' ethical challenges. The objective of this paper is to give an overview of the ethical challenges which health care inspectors encounter in their daily work. A thematic qualitative analysis was performed on cases (n = 69) that were collected from health care inspectors in a moral case deliberation pilot study. Eight themes were identified in health care regulation. These can be divided in two categories: work content and internal collaboration. The work of the health care inspectorate is morally loaded and our recommendation is that some form of ethics support is provided for health care inspectors.

Indexed as

MoralsEthical AnalysisHumansMedical AuditNetherlandsPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareEthical challengesEthics supportHealth care inspectorateHealth care regulationMoral case deliberationMoral questions

Identifiers

PMID28130719
PMCPMC5569140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.