Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130686›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2017

Sepsis: frontiers in supportive care, organisation and research.

Anders Perner, Andrew Rhodes, Bala Venkatesh, Derek C Angus, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Jean-Charles Preiser, Jean-Louis Vincent, John Marshall, Konrad Reinhart, Michael Joannidis and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. TR4 worsen urosepsis by regulating GSDMD.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Less Severe Polymicrobial Sepsis in ConditionalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Less Severe Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation in ConditionalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Regulatory Roles ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antibiotic Stewardship: Dead Bugs do not Mutate.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Deletion of theAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. anders.perner@regionh.dk.
Andrew RhodesSt. George's Healthcare NHS Trust, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Bala VenkateshDepartment of Intensive Care, Wesley Hospital and Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.
Derek C AngusDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.
Ignacio Martin-LoechesMultidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), Wellcome Trust-HRB Clinical Research, Dublin, Ireland.
Jean-Charles PreiserDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
John MarshallDepartments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Konrad ReinhartJena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Steven M OpalInfectious Diseases Division, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of its high incidence and clinical complexity, sepsis is a major challenge to clinicians and researchers and a global burden to healthcare systems and society. Despite recent progress, short- and long-term morbidity, mortality and costs remain high in both developed and developing countries. Thus, further improvements in supportive interventions and organisation of care are likely to have a substantial impact upon global health. In this narrative review, invited experts describe the challenges and progress to be made in sepsis research and care in the near future. We focus on supportive care (pulmonary, endocrine, renal, and nutritional support, mediator modulation and precision medicine), organisational themes (guidelines, outcome measures and stakeholder involvement) and clinical research as key areas to improving the care and outcomes of patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareBiomedical ResearchGlobal Burden of DiseaseGuidelines as TopicHealth Services AdministrationHumansIncidencePrecision MedicineSepsisAcute respiratory failureCritical care medicineIntensive care medicineRenal failureSepsisShock

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.