Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130648›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Short- and long-term effects of nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor phenylbutyrate on novel object recognition in zebrafish.

M P Faillace, A Pisera-Fuster, M P Medrano, A C Bejarano, R O Bernabeu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TALE and Hox Transcription Factors Control Adult Behaviors in Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms Underlying the Cognitive Benefits ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Direct Evidence for UsingAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Promnesic, Anxiolytic and Antioxidant Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M P FaillaceDepartment of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A Pisera-FusterDepartment of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M P MedranoDepartment of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A C BejaranoDepartment of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
R O BernabeuDepartment of Physiology and Institute of Physiology and Biophysics (IFIBIO), School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 7th floor, C1121ABG, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. rbernabeu@fmed.uba.ar.
University of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleZebrafish have a sophisticated color- and shape-sensitive visual system, so we examined color cue-based novel object recognition in zebrafish. We evaluated preference in the absence or presence of drugs that affect attention and memory retention in rodents: nicotine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) phenylbutyrate (PhB).

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate whether nicotine and PhB affect innate preferences of zebrafish for familiar and novel objects after short- and long-retention intervals.

methodsWe developed modified object recognition (OR) tasks using neutral novel and familiar objects in different colors. We also tested objects which differed with respect to the exploratory behavior they elicited from naïve zebrafish.

resultsZebrafish showed an innate preference for exploring red or green objects rather than yellow or blue objects. Zebrafish were better at discriminating color changes than changes in object shape or size. Nicotine significantly enhanced or changed short-term innate novel object preference whereas PhB had similar effects when preference was assessed 24 h after training. Analysis of other zebrafish behaviors corroborated these results.

conclusionsZebrafish were innately reluctant or prone to explore colored novel objects, so drug effects on innate preference for objects can be evaluated changing the color of objects with a simple geometry. Zebrafish exhibited recognition memory for novel objects with similar innate significance. Interestingly, nicotine and PhB significantly modified innate object preference.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalExploratory BehaviorFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsMaleMemoryNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPattern Recognition, VisualPhenylbutyratesRecognition, PsychologyTimeVisual PerceptionZebrafish4-phenylbutyric acidHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPhenylbutyratesAttention: perceptionHistone deacetylase inhibitorNicotineObject recognitionZebrafish behavior

Identifiers

PMID28130648
OpenAlexW2581196655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.