ArticleCBE life sciences education2017
A Comparison of Internal Dispositions and Career Trajectories after Collaborative versus Apprenticed Research Experiences for Undergraduates.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Drives Change? Characterizing Scientific Self-Efficacy Development in Undergraduate Research Experiences.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- A comparison of applicant and accepted student characteristics to research training programs with implications for recruitment and selection strategy.Frontiers in education · 2025Article
- "When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success.PloS one · 2025Article
- Empowering Underrepresented Minority Students: a STEM-Focused Research Internship Program Bridging the Path to Graduate and Professional Success.Innovative higher education · 2025Article
- Dipping Your Toe in The CURE Pool: Longitudinal Tracking of Instructors Suggests Use of a Short-Duration CURE Can Catalyze Expansion to Longer CURE Experiences.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Activity for CUREs to increase student understanding and application of responsible authorship and publication practices.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024Article
- A review of undergraduate research programs aimed at underrepresented students.STAR protocols · 2024Review
- Development of the Mentoring in Undergraduate Research Survey.CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Upper-level inter-disciplinary microbiology CUREs increase student's scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, and self-assessed skills.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024Article
- Article
- Virtually the Same? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- Converting a face-to-face neuroanatomy course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) to an online environment: lessons learned from remote teaching.Advances in physiology education · 2023Article
- A Student-Centered, Entrepreneurship Development (ASCEND) Undergraduate Summer Research Program: Foundational Training for Health Research.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- Article
- Developmental Trajectories of Student Self-Perception over a Yearlong Introductory Biology Sequence.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Current Approaches for Integrating Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research (RECR) Education into Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A National Assessment.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
- A historical perspective on training students to create standardized maps of novel brain structure: Newly-uncovered resonances between past and present research-based neuroanatomy curricula.Neuroscience letters · 2021Review
- The Relationship between Perceptions of Instructional Practices and Student Self-Efficacy In Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Courses.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
- Repetition Is Important to Students and Their Understanding during Laboratory Courses That Include Research.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021Article
- Bringing Real-World Microbiology Experiences to Undergraduate Students in Resource-Limited Environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Undergraduate research experiences confer benefits on students bound for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers, but the low number of research professionals available to serve as mentors often limits access to research. Within the context of our summer research program (BRAIN), we tested the hypothesis that a team-based collaborative learning model (CLM) produces student outcomes at least as positive as a traditional apprenticeship model (AM). Through stratified, random assignment to conditions, CLM students were designated to work together in a teaching laboratory to conduct research according to a defined curriculum led by several instructors, whereas AM students were paired with mentors in active research groups. We used pre-, mid-, and postprogram surveys to measure internal dispositions reported to predict progress toward STEM careers, such as scientific research self-efficacy, science identity, science anxiety, and commitment to a science career. We are also tracking long-term retention in science-related career paths. For both short- and longer-term outcomes, the two program formats produced similar benefits, supporting our hypothesis that the CLM provides positive outcomes while conserving resources, such as faculty mentors. We discuss this method in comparison with course-based undergraduate research and recommend its expansion to institutional settings in which mentor resources are scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.