ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
Classification of RNA structure change by 'gazing' at experimental data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for RNA secondary structure determination: gauging generalizability and broadening the scope of traditional methods.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for RNA Secondary Structure Determination: Gauging Generalizability and Broadening the Scope of Traditional Methods.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Structural analysis of MALAT1 long noncoding RNA in cells and in evolution.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- RNAsmc: A integrated tool for comparing RNA secondary structure and evaluating allosteric effects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- RNA Secondary Structure Alteration Caused by Single Nucleotide Variants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Differential analysis of RNA structure probing experiments at nucleotide resolution: uncovering regulatory functions of RNA structure.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Experimental demonstration and pan-structurome prediction of climate-associated riboSNitches in Arabidopsis.Genome biology · 2022Article
- The mRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- diffBUM-HMM: a robust statistical modeling approach for detecting RNA flexibility changes in high-throughput structure probing data.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Identification and analysis of RNA structural disruptions induced by single nucleotide variants using Riprap and RiboSNitchDB.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- DUETT quantitatively identifies known and novel events in nascent RNA structural dynamics from chemical probing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- In silico survey of the central conserved regions in viroids of theRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Integrative Analysis of Somatic Mutations in Non-coding Regions Altering RNA Secondary Structures in Cancer Genomes.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- dStruct: identifying differentially reactive regions from RNA structurome profiling data.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Quantitative Understanding of SHAPE Mechanism from RNA Structure and Dynamics Analysis.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018Article
- Allele-specific SHAPE-MaP assessment of the effects of somatic variation and protein binding on mRNA structure.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Article
- Characterization and visualization of RNA secondary structure Boltzmann ensemble via information theory.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMutations (or Single Nucleotide Variants) in folded RiboNucleic Acid structures that cause local or global conformational change are riboSNitches. Predicting riboSNitches is challenging, as it requires making two, albeit related, structure predictions. The data most often used to experimentally validate riboSNitch predictions is Selective 2' Hydroxyl Acylation by Primer Extension, or SHAPE. Experimentally establishing a riboSNitch requires the quantitative comparison of two SHAPE traces: wild-type (WT) and mutant. Historically, SHAPE data was collected on electropherograms and change in structure was evaluated by 'gel gazing.' SHAPE data is now routinely collected with next generation sequencing and/or capillary sequencers. We aim to establish a classifier capable of simulating human 'gazing' by identifying features of the SHAPE profile that human experts agree 'looks' like a riboSNitch.
resultsWe find strong quantitative agreement between experts when RNA scientists 'gaze' at SHAPE data and identify riboSNitches. We identify dynamic time warping and seven other features predictive of the human consensus. The classSNitch classifier reported here accurately reproduces human consensus for 167 mutant/WT comparisons with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) above 0.8. When we analyze 2019 mutant traces for 17 different RNAs, we find that features of the WT SHAPE reactivity allow us to improve thermodynamic structure predictions of riboSNitches. This is significant, as accurate RNA structural analysis and prediction is likely to become an important aspect of precision medicine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The classSNitch R package is freely available at http://classsnitch.r-forge.r-project.org . CONTACT: alain@email.unc.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.