Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28130241›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Classification of RNA structure change by 'gazing' at experimental data.

Chanin Tolson Woods, Alain Laederach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RNA Secondary Structure Alteration Caused by Single Nucleotide Variants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The mRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chanin Tolson WoodsDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alain LaederachDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Non-coding RNA structure change in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseR01HL111527 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alain T Laederach, Kevin M Weeks · 2012 to 2026
$6.6M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Structural and functional consequences of disease SNPs on the transcriptomeR01GM101237 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAEDERACH, ALAIN T · 2012 to 2020
$2.5M
Predicting the causative SNPs in LD blocks by allele-specific structural analysisR01HG008133 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAEDERACH, ALAIN T, WEEKS, KEVIN M · 2015 to 2017
$2.4M
ConProject-001R01GM126554 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HEITSCH, CHRISTINE E · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008133NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111527NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101237NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126554NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMutations (or Single Nucleotide Variants) in folded RiboNucleic Acid structures that cause local or global conformational change are riboSNitches. Predicting riboSNitches is challenging, as it requires making two, albeit related, structure predictions. The data most often used to experimentally validate riboSNitch predictions is Selective 2' Hydroxyl Acylation by Primer Extension, or SHAPE. Experimentally establishing a riboSNitch requires the quantitative comparison of two SHAPE traces: wild-type (WT) and mutant. Historically, SHAPE data was collected on electropherograms and change in structure was evaluated by 'gel gazing.' SHAPE data is now routinely collected with next generation sequencing and/or capillary sequencers. We aim to establish a classifier capable of simulating human 'gazing' by identifying features of the SHAPE profile that human experts agree 'looks' like a riboSNitch.

resultsWe find strong quantitative agreement between experts when RNA scientists 'gaze' at SHAPE data and identify riboSNitches. We identify dynamic time warping and seven other features predictive of the human consensus. The classSNitch classifier reported here accurately reproduces human consensus for 167 mutant/WT comparisons with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) above 0.8. When we analyze 2019 mutant traces for 17 different RNAs, we find that features of the WT SHAPE reactivity allow us to improve thermodynamic structure predictions of riboSNitches. This is significant, as accurate RNA structural analysis and prediction is likely to become an important aspect of precision medicine. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The classSNitch R package is freely available at http://classsnitch.r-forge.r-project.org . CONTACT: alain@email.unc.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareClassificationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNucleic Acid ConformationRNASequence Analysis, RNAThermodynamicsRNA

Identifiers

PMID28130241
PMCPMC5447233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.