ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2017
Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer.
Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-cancer pleiotropic analysis identifies three novel genetic risk loci for colorectal cancer.Human molecular genetics · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Guideline
- Colorectal cancer screening for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer or adenomas.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis in Northern European populations replicate multiple colorectal cancer risk loci.International journal of cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Application of Systems Genetics to Investigate Molecular Pathology of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Temporal trends of clinicopathological features, therapeutic modalities, and survival outcomes in pseudo-age-related colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- OSBPL3 promotes colorectal cancer progression through modulation of TGF-β signaling and immune cell infiltration.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Global, regional and national burden of colon and rectum cancer attributable to high fasting plasma glucose: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological significance and prognostic analysis of p21 and EGFR in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis on 12 319 cases in China.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Global Trajectories of Colorectal Cancer Burden From 1990 to 2021 and Projection to 2040.Cancer innovation · 2025Article
- Phenome-wide association study identifies multiple traits associated with a polygenic risk score for colorectal cancer.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Expression of Prooncogenic Nuclear Receptor 4A (NR4A)-Regulated Genes β1-Integrin and G9a Inhibited by Dual NR4A1/2 Ligands.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- CKMT1B regulates the proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells through the AKT/mTOR/STAT3 pathway.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals associations between gut microbiota and host transcriptome in colon cancer patients.mSystems · 2025Article
- Conjugated linoleic acid metabolite impact in colorectal cancer: a potential microbiome-based precision nutrition approach.Nutrition reviews · 2025Review
- Candidate Genetic Loci Modifying the Colorectal Cancer Risk Caused by Lifestyle Risk Factors.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Impact ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Global, regional and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the GBD 2021.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative microbiome analysis of paired mucosal and fecal samples in Korean colorectal cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2018
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsWe analyzed data from twins to determine how much the familial risk of colorectal cancer can be attributed to genetic factors vs environment. We also examined whether heritability is distinct for colon vs rectal cancer, given evidence of distinct etiologies.
methodsOur data set included 39,990 monozygotic and 61,443 same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. We compared each cancer's risk in twins of affected co-twins relative to the cohort risk (familial risk ratio [FRR]). We then estimated the proportion of variation in risk that could be attributed to genetic factors (heritability).
resultsFrom earliest registration in 1943 through 2010, there were 1861 individuals diagnosed with colon cancer and 1268 diagnosed with rectal cancer. Monozygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-3.8) relative to the cohort risk. Dizygotic twins of affected co-twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7-2.7). We estimated that 40% (95% CI, 33%-48%) of the variation in colorectal cancer risk could be attributed to genetic factors; unique environment only accounted for the remaining liability. For colon cancer, the FRR was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.1-4.5) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7-3.5) for dizygotic twins. For rectal cancer, comparable estimates were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.5-5.1) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2-4.0) for dizygotic twins. Heritability estimates for colon and rectal cancer were 16% (95% CI, 0-46%) and 15% (95% CI, 0-50%), common environment estimates were 15% (95% CI, 0-38%) and 11% (95% CI, 0-38%), and unique environment estimates were 68% (95% CI, 57%-79%) and 75% (95% CI, 61%-88%), respectively.
conclusionsInterindividual genetic differences could account for 40% of the variation in susceptibility to colorectal cancer; risk for colon and rectal cancers might have less of a genetic component than risk for colorectal cancer. Siblings, and particularly monozygotic co-twins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.