ArticleThe Journal of infection2017
Blood culture-PCR to optimise typhoid fever diagnosis after controlled human infection identifies frequent asymptomatic cases and evidence of primary bacteraemia.
Article in The Journal of infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics of enteric fever and performance of TUBEX TF IgM test in Indonesian hospitals.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Changes in monocyte subsets in volunteers who received an oral wild-typeFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Early transcriptional responses to human enteric fever challenge.Infection and immunity · 2023Article
- Article
- FromACS omega · 2023Review
- Chronic Salmonella Typhi carriage at sites other than the gallbladder.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Review
- Validation of the Nelwan Score as a screening tool for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in adults in Indonesia.PloS one · 2023Article
- Haptoglobin-Conjugated Gold Nanoclusters as a Nanoantibiotic to Combat Bacteremia.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Salmonella Typhi nucleic acid by RT-PCR and anti-HlyE, -CdtB, -PilL, and -Vi IgM by ELISA at sites in Ghana, Madagascar and Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Article
- Genetic Susceptibility to Enteric Fever in Experimentally Challenged Human Volunteers.Infection and immunity · 2022Article
- Novel Potential Diagnostic Serum Biomarkers of Metabolomics in Osteoarticular Tuberculosis Patients: A Preliminary Study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Host restriction, pathogenesis and chronic carriage of typhoidal Salmonella.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
- Enteric Fever Diagnosis: Current Challenges and Future Directions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Post-fever retinitis - Newer concepts.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Persistent Infection and Long-Term Carriage of Typhoidal and Nontyphoidal Salmonellae.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Why Is Eradicating Typhoid Fever So Challenging: Implications for Vaccine and Therapeutic Design.Vaccines · 2018Review
- Typhoid Fever Diagnosis in Endemic Countries: A Clog in the Wheel of Progress?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproved diagnostics for typhoid are needed; a typhoid controlled human infection model may accelerate their development and translation. Here, we evaluated a blood culture-PCR assay for detecting infection after controlled human infection with S. Typhi and compared test performance with optimally performed blood cultures. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsCulture-PCR amplification of blood samples was performed alongside daily blood culture in 41 participants undergoing typhoid challenge. Study endpoints for typhoid diagnosis (TD) were fever and/or bacteraemia. Overall, 24/41 (59%) participants reached TD, of whom 21/24 (86%) had ≥1 positive blood culture (53/674, 7.9% of all cultures) or 18/24 (75%) had ≥1 positive culture-PCR assay result (57/684, 8.3%). A further five non-bacteraemic participants produced culture-PCR amplicons indicating infection; overall sensitivity/specificity of the assay compared to the study endpoints were 70%/65%. We found no significant difference between blood culture and culture-PCR methods in ability to identify cases (12 mismatching pairs, p = 0.77, binomial test). Clinical and stool culture metadata demonstrated that additional culture-PCR amplification positive individuals likely represented true cases missed by blood culture, suggesting the overall attack rate may be 30/41 (73%) rather than 24/41 (59%). Several participants had positive culture-PCR results soon after ingesting challenge providing new evidence for occurrence of an early primary bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Overall the culture-PCR assay performed well, identifying extra typhoid cases compared with routine blood culture alone. Despite limitations to widespread field-use, the benefits of increased diagnostic yield, reduced blood volume and faster turn-around-time, suggest that this assay could enhance laboratory typhoid diagnostics in research applications and high-incidence settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.