ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2017
Detecting Change Using Standard Global Perimetric Indices in Glaucoma.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Online circular contrast perimetry performed in glaucoma patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-centre comparative study in Nigeria.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Methods for Visual Field Progression in Eyes With Central Visual Field Defects.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- A Bayesian Hierarchical Longitudinal Model for Estimation of Central Visual Field Rates of Change in Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Association of foveal avascular zone change and glaucoma progression.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic ability of the combination of retinal microvasculature evaluation and static automated perimetry for early primary open-angle glaucoma.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- Detection and agreement of event-based OCT and OCTA analysis for glaucoma progression.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Utility of targeted mean total deviation trend analysis for detecting progressive visual field changes in early-to-moderate stage glaucoma.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Intereye comparison of visual field progression in eyes with open-angle glaucoma.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- High sampling resolution optical coherence tomography reveals potential concurrent reductions in ganglion cell-inner plexiform and inner nuclear layer thickness but not in outer retinal thickness in glaucoma.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023Article
- The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.Ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Predicting eyes at risk for rapid glaucoma progression based on an initial visual field test using machine learning.PloS one · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the external validity of a joint structure-function model for monitoring glaucoma progression.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients With TBK1 Gene Mutations in One Large Pedigree.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Comparison of Methods to Detect and Measure Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression.Translational vision science & technology · 2019Article
- Development of a Visual Field Simulation Model of Longitudinal Point-Wise Sensitivity Changes From a Clinical Glaucoma Cohort.Translational vision science & technology · 2018Article
- Detection of Functional Change Using Cluster Trend Analysis in Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017Article
- A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Approach for Visual Field Test Forecasting.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
- Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2 Perimetry to Diagnose Glaucoma Using OCT as an Independent Reference Standard.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVarious global indices are available to summarize results from standard automated perimetry. This study asks which index can detect significant deterioration earliest, for a fixed specificity.
designComparison of prognostic indices.
methodsTwo cohorts were tested. A test-retest cohort contained 5 reliable visual fields, within a short interval, from 45 eyes of 23 participants with glaucoma and/or likelihood of developing glaucoma. A separate longitudinal cohort contained 508 eyes from 330 participants, tested on average 13 times. Three global indices were extracted: mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI). For each index we defined a critical P value Crit
resultsThe median time to detect significant deterioration with MD was 7.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-7.9 years). For VFI, the median was 8.5 years (95% CI 7.9-9.0 years); this comparison had P = .088. For PSD, the median was 10.5 years (95% CI 9.3-11.7 years), slower than MD with P < .001. Within the first 5 years of a series, MD detected significant deterioration in 138 eyes, vs 104 for VFI (P = .0013) and 107 for PSD (P = .029).
conclusionsMD detected significant deterioration sooner than VFI or PSD. In particular, MD detected more eyes in the first 5 years of their follow-up, which were presumably undergoing more rapid progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.