Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28129788›Full record

SynthesisBMC research notes2017

Meta-analysis to estimate the load of Leptospira excreted in urine: beyond rats as important sources of transmission in low-income rural communities.

Veronica Barragan, Nathan Nieto, Paul Keim, Talima Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Backyard Livestock Guinea Pigs Are Reservoirs forTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  8. High prevalence and diversity ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  9. A first insight into the occurrence ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Serologically Confirmed Human Leptospirosis in Colombia, 2015-2020.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Veronica BarraganPathogen & Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA.
Nathan NietoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5640, USA.
Paul KeimPathogen & Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA.
Talima PearsonPathogen & Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-4073, USA. talima.pearson@nau.edu.
Northern Arizona University · US

Funding

Environmental sampling of Leptospira species to link to human leptospirosis casesR15AI101913 · NIAID · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI PEARSON, TALIMA ROSS · 2013 to 2013
$436k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI101913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeptospirosis is a major zoonotic disease with widespread distribution and a large impact on human health. Carrier animals excrete pathogenic Leptospira primarily in their urine. Infection occurs when the pathogen enters a host through mucosa or small skin abrasions. Humans and other animals are exposed to the pathogen by direct contact with urine, contaminated soil or water. While many factors influence environmental cycling and the transmission of Leptospira to humans, the load of pathogenic Leptospira in the environment is likely to play a major role. Peridomestic rats are often implicated as a potential source of human disease; however exposure to other animals is a risk factor as well. The aim of this report is to highlight the importance of various carrier animals in terms of the quantity of Leptospira shed into the environment. For this, we performed a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of the amount of pathogen that various animal species shed in their urine.

resultsThe quantity of pathogen has been reported for cows, deer, dogs, humans, mice, and rats, in a total of 14 research articles. We estimated the average Leptospira per unit volume shed by each animal species, and the daily environmental contribution by considering the total volume of urine excreted by each carrier animal. Rats excrete the highest quantity of Leptospira per millilitre of urine (median = 5.7 × 10

conclusionsHere we illustrate how, in a low-income rural Ecuadorian community, host population demographics, and prevalence of Leptospira infection can be integrated with estimates of shed Leptospira to suggest that peridomestic cattle may be more important than rats in environmental cycling and ultimately, transmission to humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleDeerDogsEcuadorHumansLeptospiraLeptospirosisMicePovertyRatsRural PopulationZoonosesAnimal reservoirsLeptospiraTransmissionUrine

Identifiers

PMID28129788
PMCPMC5273803
OpenAlexW2580635611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.