Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28129783›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

The Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Charlotte Mühlmann, Trine Madsen, Carsten Hjorthøj, Ad Kerkhof, Merete Nordentoft, Annette Erlangsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02872610 (The Self-help Online Against Suicidal Thoughts), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02872610 nacompletednot on this map

The Self-help Online Against Suicidal Thoughts (SOS) Trial - a Danish Randomized Wait-list Controlled Trial for People With Suicidal Thoughts

TypeinterventionalSponsorMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled439ConditionsSuicidal ThoughtsArmsSelf-help Online
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. mHealth Interventions for Self-Harm: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte MühlmannDanish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark. Charlotte.Muehlmann@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-1626
Trine MadsenDanish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Carsten HjorthøjCopenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Ad KerkhofDepartment of Clinical, Neuro, and Developmental Psychology and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merete NordentoftDanish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Annette ErlangsenDanish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Kildegårdsvej 28, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicidal thoughts are common, causing distress for millions of people all over the world. However, people with suicidal thoughts might not access support due to financial restraints, stigma or a lack of available treatment offers. Self-help programs provided online could overcome these barriers, and previous efforts show promising results in terms of reducing suicidal thoughts. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of an online self-help intervention in reducing suicidal thoughts among people at risk of suicide. The Danish Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial is a partial replication of a previously conducted Dutch trial. METHODS AND

designA randomized, waiting-list controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio will be carried out. A total of 438 people with suicidal thoughts will be recruited from the Danish suicide hotline, The Lifeline's, website and allocated to the intervention condition (N = 219) or the control condition (N = 219). The intervention condition consists of a 6-week, Internet-based self-help therapy intervention. The format of the intervention is self-help, but the participants can be guided by the trial manager. The control condition consists of a waiting-list assignment for 32 weeks. The primary outcomes are frequency and intensity of suicidal thoughts. Secondary outcome measures include depressive symptoms, hopelessness, worrying, quality of life, costs related to health care utilization and production loss. Number of deliberate self-harm episodes, suicides and deaths will, as well as the participant's evaluation of the intervention and the experience of negative effects, be investigated. Assessments will be conducted over the intervention website through self-report questionnaires at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 32 weeks (6 months post intervention). DISCUSSION: If we find the intervention to be linked to reductions in suicidal thoughts, this will strengthen the evidence that online self-help interventions are relevant tools for people with suicidal thoughts.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872610 . Registered on 9 August 2016.

Indexed as

InternetSelf-Help GroupsSuicide PreventionClinical ProtocolsDenmarkHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch DesignSuicidal IdeationSuicideSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCognitive behavioral therapyInternet interventionOnline interventionRandomized controlled trialSelf-helpSuicidal ideationSuicidal thoughts

Identifiers

PMID28129783
PMCPMC5273797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.