Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28129737›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2017

Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning and isoflurane anesthesia in an experimental model of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Theo P Menting, Mehmet Ergun, Moira H D Bruintjes, Kimberley E Wever, Roger M L M Lomme, Harry van Goor, Michiel C Warlé

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rodent models of AKI and AKI-CKD transition: an update in 2024.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rodent models of AKI-CKD transition.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Theo P MentingDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Theo.menting@radboudumc.nl.
Mehmet ErgunDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Moira H D BruintjesDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kimberley E WeverSystematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation, SYRCLE, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roger M L M LommeDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michiel C WarléDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn animal studies, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and anesthetic preconditioning are successful in reducing renal ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), however the protective effect of RIPC may be improved by repeating the RIPC stimulus.

methodsSprague-Dawley rats underwent unilateral nephrectomy followed by 30 min of renal pedicle clamping. Animals were allocated into six groups: sham, control (IRI), RepISO (daily isoflurane anesthesia), RIPC (single dose isoflurane anesthesia and single dose RIPC), RepISO + RIPC (7-day isoflurane anesthesia and single dose RIPC) and RepISO + RepRIPC (7-day isoflurane anesthesia with 7-day RIPC). RIPC was applied by 3×5 min of cuff inflation on both thighs. Serum creatinine and urea levels were measured and histology was obtained at day two.

resultsRepISO diminished renal IRI, as reflected by a significant reduction in serum creatinine levels as compared to the control group, 170 ± 74 resp. 107 ± 29 μmol/L. The other preconditioning protocols showed similar reduction in serum creatinine levels as compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between the different preconditioning protocols. For urea levels, only RepISO + RIPC resulted in significantly lower levels as compared to the control group, 14 ± 4 resp. 22 ± 7 mmol/L (p = 0.010). In the preconditioning groups only RepISO showed less histological damage as compared to controls 1.73 ± 1.19 resp. 2.91 ± 1.22 (p = 0.032).

conclusionsIn this study no additional protective effect of repeated ischemic preconditioning was observed as compared to single dose RIPC. Repeated administration of isoflurane provided stronger protection against renal IRI as compared to single dose isoflurane.

Indexed as

AnimalsCreatinineDisease Models, AnimalIschemic PreconditioningIsofluraneKidneyMaleProtective FactorsRatsReperfusion InjuryUreaCreatinineIsofluraneUreaAnesthetic preconditioningAnimal experimentIschemia reperfusion injuryKidneyRepeated remote ischemic preconditioning

Identifiers

PMID28129737
PMCPMC5273799
OpenAlexW2581879267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.