Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28129416›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2017

Object crowding in age-related macular degeneration.

Julian M Wallace, Susana T L Chung, Bosco S Tjan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. How Accurate are Our Near Reading Charts? An Assessment of 19 Charts Against ISO Standards.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rapid assessment of peripheral visual crowding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julian M WallaceDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USAjulian.m.wallace@googlemail.com.
Susana T L ChungSchool of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USAs.chung@berkeley.edu.
Bosco S TjanDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USANeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Google (United States) · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

READING IN PERIPHERAL VISIONR01EY012810 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI CHUNG, SUSANA T · 2000 to 2017
$3.8M
Form Processing in Peripheral VisionR01EY017707 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, NIHONG, CHUNG, SUSANA T · 2008 to 2018
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012810NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crowding, the phenomenon of impeded object identification due to clutter, is believed to be a key limiting factor of form vision in the peripheral visual field. The present study provides a characterization of object crowding in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) measured at the participants' respective preferred retinal loci with binocular viewing. Crowding was also measured in young and age-matched controls at the same retinal locations, using a fixation-contingent display paradigm to allow unlimited stimulus duration. With objects, the critical spacing of crowding for AMD participants was not substantially different from controls. However, baseline contrast energy thresholds in the noncrowded condition were four times that of the controls. Crowding further exacerbated deficits in contrast sensitivity to three times the normal crowding-induced contrast energy threshold elevation. These findings indicate that contrast-sensitivity deficit is a major limiting factor of object recognition for individuals with AMD, in addition to crowding. Focusing on this more tractable deficit of AMD may lead to more effective remediation and technological assistance.

Indexed as

CrowdingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleRetinaVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28129416
PMCPMC5283087
OpenAlexW2581570733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.