Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28129018›Full record

ReviewGut microbes2017

Challenges in fecal donor selection and screening for fecal microbiota transplantation: A review.

Michael H Woodworth, Cynthia Carpentieri, Kaitlin L Sitchenko, Colleen S Kraft

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05035784 (Retrograde Colonic Enema With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation vs Retrograde Colonic Enema Only in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05035784 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Retrograde Colonic Enema With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation vs Retrograde Colonic Enema Only in the Treatment of Childhood Constipation

TypeinterventionalSponsorShengjing HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled110ConditionsFecal Microbiota Transplantation, Constipation - FunctionalArmsFecal supernatant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microbiome Therapeutics for Clostridioides difficile Infection.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael H Woodwortha Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-4599
Cynthia Carpentieria Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Kaitlin L Sitchenkoa Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4098-3422
Colleen S Krafta Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-8477
Emory University · US

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation is best understood as an effective and inexpensive therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but fecal donor selection and screening should be periodically revised. Here, we review current recommendations for selection and screening of fecal donors for fecal microbiota transplantation. We recommend considering diabetes mellitus, prior cardiovascular events, and clinical healthcare exposure as fecal donor exclusion criteria until more is known about the association of these conditions with the human gut microbiome. We review the non-bacterial members of the human gut microbiome, associations of the gut microbiome with colorectal malignancies, the human gut resistome and how these may impact future donor screening recommendations. Collaboration between clinicians, clinical laboratory scientists, industry and regulatory agencies will be critically important for continued improvement in donor selection and screening.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionFecal Microbiota TransplantationClostridium InfectionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMetabolic DiseasesObesityUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationantibiotic resistanceClostridium difficilefecal microbiota transplantationFMTgut microbial therapeuticsmicrobiomeresistomestool donor screening

Identifiers

PMID28129018
PMCPMC5479407
OpenAlexW2582073809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.