ArticleACS nano2017
Computational Sensing Using Low-Cost and Mobile Plasmonic Readers Designed by Machine Learning.
Article in ACS nano, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Broadband on-chip spectral sensing via directly integrated narrowband plasmonic filters for computational multispectral imaging.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Beyond Spectral Resolution in Nanophotonic Sensing: Picometer-Level Precision with Multispectral Readout.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Roadmap on Label-Free Super-Resolution Imaging.Laser & photonics reviews · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approach for the Localization and Analysis of Surface Plasmon Scattering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Engineering Innovative Interfaces for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2023Review
- Smartphone-based platforms implementing microfluidic detection with image-based artificial intelligence.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Machine learning-augmented surface-enhanced spectroscopy toward next-generation molecular diagnostics.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Computational spectrometers enabled by nanophotonics and deep learning.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Plasmonic nanosensors for point-of-care biomarker detection.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Review
- Decoding Optical Data with Machine Learning.Laser & photonics reviews · 2021Article
- Scalable Fabrication of Quasi-One-Dimensional Gold Nanoribbons for Plasmonic Sensing.Nano letters · 2020Article
- Metasurfaces-based imaging and applications: from miniaturized optical components to functional imaging platforms.Nanoscale advances · 2020Review
- Deep learning-enabled point-of-care sensing using multiplexed paper-based sensors.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Optical Interrogation Techniques for Nanophotonic Biochemical Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Array-based "Chemical Nose" Sensing in Diagnostics and Drug Discovery.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2019Review
- Nanoplasmonic Approaches for Sensitive Detection and Molecular Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Review
- Plasmonic molecular assays: Recent advances and applications for mobile health.Nano research · 2018Review
- Paper-based assays for urine analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasmonic sensors have been used for a wide range of biological and chemical sensing applications. Emerging nanofabrication techniques have enabled these sensors to be cost-effectively mass manufactured onto various types of substrates. To accompany these advances, major improvements in sensor read-out devices must also be achieved to fully realize the broad impact of plasmonic nanosensors. Here, we propose a machine learning framework which can be used to design low-cost and mobile multispectral plasmonic readers that do not use traditionally employed bulky and expensive stabilized light sources or high-resolution spectrometers. By training a feature selection model over a large set of fabricated plasmonic nanosensors, we select the optimal set of illumination light-emitting diodes needed to create a minimum-error refractive index prediction model, which statistically takes into account the varied spectral responses and fabrication-induced variability of a given sensor design. This computational sensing approach was experimentally validated using a modular mobile plasmonic reader. We tested different plasmonic sensors with hexagonal and square periodicity nanohole arrays and revealed that the optimal illumination bands differ from those that are "intuitively" selected based on the spectral features of the sensor, e.g., transmission peaks or valleys. This framework provides a universal tool for the plasmonics community to design low-cost and mobile multispectral readers, helping the translation of nanosensing technologies to various emerging applications such as wearable sensing, personalized medicine, and point-of-care diagnostics. Beyond plasmonics, other types of sensors that operate based on spectral changes can broadly benefit from this approach, including e.g., aptamer-enabled nanoparticle assays and graphene-based sensors, among others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.