Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28128714›Full record

SynthesisImmunotherapy2017

Donor origin CAR T cells: graft versus malignancy effect without GVHD, a systematic review.

Faiz Anwer, Al-Aman Shaukat, Umar Zahid, Muhammad Husnain, Ali McBride, Daniel Persky, Melissa Lim, Nida Hasan, Irbaz Bin Riaz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Immunotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dose fractionation of CAR-T cells. A systematic review of clinical outcomes.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Faiz AnwerDepartment of Medicine, Hematology & Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Al-Aman ShaukatJames Paget University Hospital, Norfolk, UK.
Umar ZahidDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Muhammad HusnainDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ali McBrideCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Daniel PerskyDepartment of Medicine, Hematology & Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Melissa LimArizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nida HasanUniversity of Arizona Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Irbaz Bin RiazDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · USJames Paget University Hospital · GB

Funding

VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
SHORT-TERM TRAINING STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SCHOT35HL007479 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GEOFFREY C GURTNER, JAMES Kuang-Jan LIAO · 1985 to 2026
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD19, CD20 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy has shown promising results for the treatment of relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies. Best results have been reported in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with a complete response rate above 80%. Patients who received donor-derived CAR T cells for the relapsed malignancy after stem cell transplantation (allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant) were identified from the published trials. A total of 72 patients from seven studies were treated with donor-derived CAR T cells. Only five out of 72 patients (6.9%) developed graft versus host disease. Use of donor-derived CAR T cell for relapse prophylaxis, minimal residual disease clearance or salvage from relapse is therefore highly effective, and risk of graft versus host disease flare is very low. Side effects include cytokine release syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome, B-cell aplasia along with CNS toxicity.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsAntigens, CD19Antigens, CD20Graft vs Host DiseaseGraft vs Tumor EffectHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRecurrenceTissue DonorsT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousAntigens, CD19Antigens, CD20Receptors, Antigen, T-CellRecombinant Fusion Proteinsallogenic stem cell transplantationchimeric antigen T cellsgraft versus leukemiahematological malignancyrelapsesalvage

Identifiers

PMID28128714
PMCPMC5827793
OpenAlexW2582009637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.