Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28128312›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Predicts Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction a systematic meta-analysis.

Raluca-Ileana Mincu, Rolf Alexander Jánosi, Dragos Vinereanu, Tienush Rassaf, Matthias Totzeck

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Inflammation in the Peri-ACS Period: Ready for Prime Time?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raluca-Ileana MincuUniversity Hospital Essen, Medical Faculty, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Diseases, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Rolf Alexander JánosiUniversity Hospital Essen, Medical Faculty, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Diseases, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Dragos VinereanuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila - University and Emergency Hospital, Cardiac Research Unit, Splaiul Independentei 169, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Tienush RassafUniversity Hospital Essen, Medical Faculty, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Diseases, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Matthias TotzeckUniversity Hospital Essen, Medical Faculty, West German Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Diseases, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DECarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is critical in order to provide adequate treatment. We performed a systematic meta-analysis to assess the predictive role of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We included 7 studies, out of 1,033 studies, with a total of 6,993 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, which were divided in the high or low CRP group, according to the validated cut-off values provided by the corresponding CRP assay. High CRP values were associated with increased in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality, in-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). The pre-procedural CRP predicted in-hospital target vessel revascularization (TVR), but was not associated with acute/subacute and follow-up in-stent restenosis (ISR), and follow-up TVR. Thus, pre-procedural serum CRP could be a valuable predictor of global cardiovascular risk, rather than a predictor of stent-related complications in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. This biomarker might have the potential to improve the management of these high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionC-Reactive ProteinFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMyocardial RevascularizationOdds RatioPublication BiasST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStentsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID28128312
PMCPMC5270244
OpenAlexW2582451476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.