Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127934›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2017

Antipsychotic augmentation vs. monotherapy in schizophrenia: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

Britta Galling, Alexandra Roldán, Katsuhiko Hagi, Liz Rietschel, Frozan Walyzada, Wei Zheng, Xiao-Lan Cao, Yu-Tao Xiang, Mathias Zink, John M Kane and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 230 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Schizophrenia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Combining Three Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Case Series.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Schizophrenia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Schizophrenia treatment preferences of psychiatrists versus guidelines: A European perspective.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Britta GallingDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Alexandra RoldánDepartment of Psychiatry, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Katsuhiko HagiZucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Liz RietschelUniversity Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Frozan WalyzadaZucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Wei ZhengGuangzhou Brain Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Lan CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yu-Tao XiangUnit of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macao, Taipa, Macao, SAR, China.
Mathias ZinkCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
John M KaneZucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Jimmi NielsenDepartment of Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Stefan LeuchtKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Christoph U CorrellZucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Northwell Health · USZucker Hillside Hospital · USAalborg University · DKAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USChinese University of Hong Kong · CNGuangzhou Psychiatric Hospital · CNHeidelberg University · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie · DEUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

Trials Operation Unit (OPERATIONS CORE)P30MH090590 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI CORRELL, CHRISTOPH U · 2010 to 2014
$7.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia is much debated, since it is common and costly with unclear evidence for its efficacy and safety. We conducted a systematic literature search and a random effects meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing augmentation with a second antipsychotic vs. continued antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia. Co-primary outcomes were total symptom reduction and study-defined response. Antipsychotic augmentation was superior to monotherapy regarding total symptom reduction (16 studies, N=694, standardized mean difference, SMD=-0.53, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.19, p=0.002). However, superiority was only apparent in open-label and low-quality trials (both p<0.001), but not in double-blind and high-quality ones (p=0.120 and 0.226, respectively). Study-defined response was similar between antipsychotic augmentation and monotherapy (14 studies, N=938, risk ratio = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.42, p=0.061), being clearly non-significant in double-blind and high-quality studies (both p=0.990). Findings were replicated in clozapine and non-clozapine augmentation studies. No differences emerged regarding all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation, global clinical impression, as well as positive, general and depressive symptoms. Negative symptoms improved more with augmentation treatment (18 studies, N=931, SMD=-0.38, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.13, p<0.003), but only in studies augmenting with aripiprazole (8 studies, N=532, SMD=-0.41, 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.03, p=0.036). Few adverse effect differences emerged: D2 antagonist augmentation was associated with less insomnia (p=0.028), but more prolactin elevation (p=0.015), while aripiprazole augmentation was associated with reduced prolactin levels (p<0.001) and body weight (p=0.030). These data suggest that the common practice of antipsychotic augmentation in schizophrenia lacks double-blind/high-quality evidence for efficacy, except for negative symptom reduction with aripiprazole augmentation.

Indexed as

Antipsychoticsaripiprazoleaugmentationclozapinemonotherapypolypharmacyschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID28127934
PMCPMC5269492
OpenAlexW2580347876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.