Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127808›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2017

A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce drug use among adults in a low-income urban emergency department: the HealthiER You study.

Frederic C Blow, Maureen A Walton, Amy S B Bohnert, Rosalinda V Ignacio, Stephen Chermack, Rebecca M Cunningham, Brenda M Booth, Mark Ilgen, Kristen L Barry

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brief Drug Interventions Delivered in General Medical Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frederic C BlowUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Maureen A WaltonUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amy S B BohnertUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rosalinda V IgnacioUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stephen ChermackUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rebecca M CunninghamInjury Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brenda M BoothDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mark IlgenUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kristen L BarryUniversity of Michigan, Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Optimizing SBIRT for Drug-Using Patients in an Inner-City Emergency DepartmentR01DA026029 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLOW, FREDERIC C · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo examine efficacy of drug brief interventions (BIs) among adults presenting to a low-income urban emergency department (ED).

designRandomized controlled trial on drug use outcomes at 3, 6 and 12 months. Participants were assigned to (1) computer-delivered BI (Computer BI), (2) therapist-delivered, computer-guided BI (Therapist BI) or (3) enhanced usual care (EUC-ED) for drug-using adults. Participants were re-randomized after the 3-month assessment to either adapted motivational enhancement therapy (AMET) booster or enhanced usual care booster (EUC-B).

settingPatients recruited from low-income urban emergency departments (ED) in Flint, Michigan, USA.

participantsA total of 780 ED patients reporting recent drug use, 44% males, mean age = 31 years.

interventionsComputer BI consisted of an interactive program guided by a virtual health counselor. Therapist BI included computer guidance. The EUC-ED conditions included review of community health and HIV prevention resources. The BIs and boosters were based on motivational interviewing, focusing on reduction of drug use and HIV risk behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was past 90 days using drugs at 6 and 12 months and secondary outcomes were weighted drug-days and days of marijuana use.

findingsPercentage changes in mean days used any drug from baseline to 12 months were: Computer BI + EUC-B: -10.9%, P = 0.0844; Therapist BI + EUC-B: -26.7%, P = 0.0041, for EUC-ED + EUC-B: -20.9, P = 0.0011. In adjusted analyses, there was no significant interaction between ED intervention and booster AMET for primary and secondary outcomes. Compared with EUC-ED, Therapist BI reduced number of days using any drug [95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.41, -0.07, P = 0.0422] and weighted drug-days (95% CI = -0.41, -0.08, P = 0.0283). Both Therapist and Computer BI had significantly fewer number of days using marijuana compared to EUC-ED (Therapist BI: 95% CI = -0.42, -0.06, P = 0.0104, Computer BI: 95% CI = -0.34, -0.01, P = 0.0406). Booster effects were not significant.

conclusionsAn emergency department-based motivational brief intervention, delivered by a therapist and guided by computer, appears to reduce drug use among adults seeking emergency department care compared with enhanced usual care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPovertyUrban PopulationAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMichiganMotivational InterviewingSubstance-Related DisordersTimeTreatment OutcomeBrief interventioncomputerdrugsemergency departmentinterventionmarijuanamotivational interviewingsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID28127808
OpenAlexW2582827577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.