Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127795›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017

Weighted averaging in spectroscopic studies improves statistical power.

Jack J Miller, Lowri Cochlin, Kieran Clarke, Damian J Tyler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A data-driven algorithm to determineMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. HyperpolarizedNMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid,Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The influence of HoPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2019
    Article
  12. Scientific reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jack J MillerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6258-1299
Lowri CochlinDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kieran ClarkeDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Damian J TylerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/10/002/28078British Heart Foundation FS/11/50/29038British Heart Foundation FS/14/17/30634British Heart Foundation RG/07/004/22659British Heart Foundation RG/11/9/28921Medical Research Council G0601490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn vivo MRS is often characterized by a spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that varies highly between experiments. A common design for spectroscopic studies is to compare the ratio of two spectral peak amplitudes between groups, e.g. individual PCr/γ-ATP ratios in THEORY: The canonical theory for the propagation of uncertainty on the ratio of two spectral peaks and its incorporation in the Frequentist hypothesis testing framework by weighted averaging is presented.

methodsTwo retrospective re-analyses of studies comparing spectral peak ratios and one prospective simulation were performed using both the weighted and unweighted methods.

resultsIt was found that propagating uncertainty correctly improved statistical power in all cases considered, which could be used to reduce the number of subjects required to perform an MR study.

conclusionThe variability of in vivo spectroscopy data is often accounted for by requiring it to meet an SNR threshold. A theoretically sound propagation of the variable uncertainty caused by quantifying spectra of differing SNR is therefore likely to improve the power of in vivo spectroscopy studies. Magn Reson Med 78:2082-2094, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationDiabetes MellitusHumansModels, StatisticalMolecular ImagingMonte Carlo MethodPhosphorusProspective StudiesRatsRats, Inbred SHRReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesPhosphorus13C spectroscopy31P spectroscopybiostatisticshyperpolarized 13Cmagnetic resonance spectroscopyphosphorus MRSuncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID28127795
PMCPMC5697704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.