Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127669›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Neuron-specific enolase and response to initial therapy are important prognostic factors in patients with small cell lung cancer.

M Zhou, Z Wang, Y Yao, H Zhou, M Liu, J Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M ZhouDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-4127
Z WangDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.
Y YaoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.
H ZhouDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.
M LiuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China.
J SunDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 51 Fucheng Road, Beijing, 100048, People's Republic of China. sjunzh07@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognostic factors for the survival of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients are still widely debated. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical features and prognostic factors in SCLC patients.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on SCLC patients who were treated in our hospital between July 2010 and July 2015. Comparison of overall survival (OS) was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for OS were identified by multivariate Cox regression models.

resultsA total of 523 patients with complete data and ECOG 0-2 were enrolled in our study. A total of 383 patients (73.2%) were diagnosed with ES-SCLC (extensive-stage SCLC) and 140 patients (26.8%) were diagnosed with LS-SCLC (limited-stage SCLC). In all patients, early disease stage, good ECOG, normal neuron-specific enolase (NSE), thoracic radiotherapy, ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation, good response to initial therapy were independent favorable prognostic factors for OS, along with gender, age, CEA and CA125. In LS-SCLC patients, normal NSE, normal CEA, good response to initial therapy and surgery were independent favorable prognostic factors for OS. In ES-SCLC patients, good ECOG, normal NSE, thoracic radiotherapy, ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation and good response to initial therapy were independent favorable prognostic factors for OS. Remarkably, NSE and response to initial therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS in all SCLC patients, LS-SCLC patients and ES-SCLC patients.

conclusionThe normal NSE and good response to initial therapy predicted a better survival for SCLC patients, regardless of disease stage.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhosphopyruvate HydratasePrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorPhosphopyruvate HydrataseNeuron-specific enolaseOverall survivalSmall cell lung cancerTherapy response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.