Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127453›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2016

How to lower postoperative complications after radical cystectomy - a review.

Wojciech Krajewski, Romuald Zdrojowy, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Anna Kołodziej

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Competing risks of cystectomy - from calculator to decision.Central European journal of urology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wojciech KrajewskiUrology and Urologic Oncology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Romuald ZdrojowyUrology and Urologic Oncology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Krzysztof TupikowskiUrology and Urologic Oncology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Bartosz MałkiewiczUrology and Urologic Oncology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Anna KołodziejUrology and Urologic Oncology Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLowering morbidity and mortality after RC is subject of considerable interest. Lately, many evidence-based data on improvements in operative technique, anesthetic management, and patient care have been published. In this article, we present a review of literature on how to lower postoperative complications after RC. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched without a time limit on February 2016 using the terms 'cystectomy' in conjunction with 'radical', 'bladder cancer', 'complications' or 'management'. Boolean operators (NOT, AND, OR) were also used in succession to narrow and broaden the search. The search was limited to the English, Polish and Spanish literature.

resultsMany complications may be avoided by appropriate patient selection and meticulous introduction of care protocols.

conclusionsRC as treatment free of complications, even in the hands of an experienced urologist, does not exist. A large number of complications are acceptable in the name of good long-term results. Optimum results are possible with proper surgical technique, good patients and urinary diversion selection and proper patient management in the pre-, peri, and postoperative period.

Indexed as

bladder cancercomplications

Identifiers

PMID28127453
PMCPMC5260457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.