Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127445›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2016

Extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy - a multi-institutional analysis.

Sebastian Piotrowicz, Sławomir Poletajew, Stefan W Czarniecki, Filip Kowalski, Grzegorz Nowak, Maciej Oszczudłowski, Marta Sochaj, Jakub Dobruch, Piotr Radziszewski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian PiotrowiczDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Medical Education Centre, European Health Center, Otwock, Poland.
Sławomir PoletajewDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Stefan W CzarnieckiDepartment of Urology, Independent Public Specialist John Paul II Western Hospital, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland.
Filip KowalskiDepartment of Urology, A. Jurasz University Hospital No. 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Grzegorz NowakDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Maciej OszczudłowskiDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Medical Education Centre, Professor Witold Orłowski Independent Public Clinical Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta SochajDepartment of Urology, University Clinical Hospital Military Memorial Medical Academy - Central Veterans' Hospital, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Jakub DobruchDepartment of Urology, Postgraduate Medical Education Centre, European Health Center, Otwock, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLAntoni Jurasz University Hospital · PLGrochowski Hospital · PLJohn Paul II Hospital · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node dissection (LND) performed at radical cystectomy (RC) has therapeutic and staging significance. However, the extent of LND remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze surgical patterns and results of LND in a contemporary series of patients with bladder cancer. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 consecutive patients subjected to RC in seven urological centres in the year 2013. The mean age of the cohort was 66.6 years. There were 49 cases of organ confined and 64 cases of locally advanced disease. Study endpoints were: status and extent of LND, number of LNs removed, and number of positive LNs. LND was performed in 102 patients (90.3%). Detailed data on the anatomical extent of LND was available in 82 patients (80.4%). Limited (lLND) and extended LND (eLND) was performed in 68.3% (n = 56) and 31.7% (n = 26) of patients, respectively. Obturator fossa LNs were removed in 84.1%, external iliac in 72.0%, internal iliac in 40.2%, common iliac in 31.7%, and presacral in 15.9% of cases. The median number of LNs removed in the whole study cohort, in patients who underwent lLND, and eLND, was 8.5, 5, and 16.5, respectively. In 28 patients (27.5%), LN metastases were diagnosed, including 6 cases (12.5%) in the organ-confined cohort and 22 cases (34.4%) in the locally advanced disease cohort. LND is an integral part of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. However, in the majority of patients, the extent of the procedure was suboptimal, potentially negatively affecting the survival and adequacy of pathological staging.

Indexed as

bladder cancercystectomylymphadenectomystagingsurvival

Identifiers

PMID28127445
PMCPMC5260464
OpenAlexW2986906321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.