Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127405›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2017

Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes in a large community-based study in North India: results from a STEPS survey in Punjab, India.

Jaya Prasad Tripathy, J S Thakur, Gursimer Jeet, Sohan Chawla, Sanjay Jain, Arnab Pal, Rajendra Prasad, Rajiv Saran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hypoglycemic, Antihyperglycemic, and Toxic Effects ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaya Prasad TripathyInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, The Union South East Asia Office, New Delhi, India.
J S ThakurSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Gursimer JeetSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sohan ChawlaSchool of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sanjay JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arnab PalDepartment of Biochemistry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rajendra PrasadDepartment of Biochemistry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rajiv SaranDepartment of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIndia is the diabetes capital with home to 69.1 million people with DM, the second highest number of cases after China. Recent epidemiological evidence indicates a rising DM epidemic across all classes, both affluent and the poor in India. This article reports on the prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in the North Indian state of Punjab as part of a large household NCD Risk Factor Survey.

methodsA household NCD STEPS survey was done in the state of Punjab, India in a multistage stratified sample of 5127 individuals. All the subjects were administered the WHO STEPS questionnaire, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Every alternate respondent in the sample (n = 2499) was assayed for blood parameters.

resultsOverall prevalence of DM among the study participants was found out to be 8.3% (95% CI 7.3-9.4%) whereas prevalence of prediabetes was 6.3% (5.4-7.3%). Age group (45-69 years), marital status, hypertension, obesity and family history of DM were found to be the risk factors significantly associated with DM. Out of all persons with DM, only 18% were known case of DM or on treatment, among whom only about one-third had controlled blood glucose status.

conclusionsThe study reported high prevalence of diabetes, especially of undiagnosed cases amongst the adult population, most of whom have uncontrolled blood sugar levels. This indicates the need for systematic screening and awareness program to identify the undiagnosed cases in the community and offer early treatment and regular follow up.

Indexed as

DiabetesEpidemiologySTEPS survey

Identifiers

PMID28127405
PMCPMC5259959
OpenAlexW2581163693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.