Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127399›Full record

ReviewJournal of biological engineering2017

Future developments in biosensors for field-ready Zika virus diagnostics.

Ariana M Nicolini, Katherine E McCracken, Jeong-Yeol Yoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biosensors for the detection of flaviviruses: A review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  3. Electrochemical biosensor detection on respiratory and flaviviruses.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Recent Developments in Nanotechnology for Detection and Control ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ariana M Nicolini *Biomedical Engineering Graduate Interdisciplinary Program and Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
Katherine E McCracken *Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
Jeong-Yeol YoonBiomedical Engineering Graduate Interdisciplinary Program and Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since early reports of the recent Zika virus outbreak in May 2015, much has been learned and discussed regarding Zika virus infection and transmission. However, many opportunities still remain for translating these findings into field-ready sensors and diagnostics. In this brief review, we discuss current diagnostic methods, consider the prospects of translating other flavivirus biosensors directly to Zika virus sensing, and look toward the future developments needed for high-sensitivity and high-specificity biosensors to come.

Indexed as

BiosensorsFlavivirusesImmunoassaysLAMPRT-PCRZika

Identifiers

PMID28127399
PMCPMC5260080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.