Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28127061›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2017

Development and validation of the Salzburg COPD-screening questionnaire (SCSQ): a questionnaire development and validation study.

Gertraud Weiss, Ina Steinacher, Bernd Lamprecht, Bernhard Kaiser, Romana Mikes, Lea Sator, Sylvia Hartl, Helga Wagner, M Studnicka

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance of alternative COPD case-finding tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gertraud WeissDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. g.weiss@salk.at.
Ina SteinacherDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Bernd LamprechtDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kepler-University-Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Bernhard KaiserDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Romana MikesDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Lea SatorDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Sylvia HartlLudwig Boltzmann Institute of COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Helga WagnerDepartment for Statistics, University of Linz, Linz, Austria.
M StudnickaDepartment of Pneumology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD And Respiratory Epidemiology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence rates are still high. However, the majority of subjects are not diagnosed. Strategies have to be implemented to overcome the problem of under-diagnosis. Questionnaires could be used to pre-select subjects for spirometry and thereby help reducing under-diagnosis. We report a brief, simple, self-administrable and validated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire to increase the pre-test probability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis in subjects undergoing confirmatory spirometry. In 2005, we completed the Austrian Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease-study in 1258 subjects aged >40 years. Post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed, and non-reversible airflow limitation defined by FEV CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE: QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PRE-SCREENING POTENTIAL SUFFERERS: Scientists in Austria have developed a brief, simple questionnaire to identify patients likely to have early-stage chronic lung disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is notoriously difficult to diagnose, and the condition often causes irreversible lung damage before it is identified. Finding a simple, cost-effective method of pre-screening patients with suspected early-stage COPD could potentially improve treatment responses and limit the burden of extensive lung function ('spirometry') tests on health services. Gertraud Weiss at Paracelsus Medical University, Austria, and co-workers have developed and validated an easy-to-use, self-administered questionnaire that could prove effective for pre-screening patients. The team trialed the five-point Salzburg COPD-screening questionnaire on 1258 patients. Patients scoring 2 points or above on the questionnaire underwent spirometry tests. The questionnaire seems to provide a sensitive and cost-effective way of pre-selecting patients for spirometry referral.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareActivities of Daily LivingBronchodilator AgentsCoughExerciseFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory SoundsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID28127061
PMCPMC5434771
OpenAlexW2583020087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.