ArticleTranslational oncology2017
Prognostic Value of E-cadherin-, CD44-, and MSH2-associated Nomograms in Patients With Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Translational oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of E-cadherin on Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Update.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Pooled it
- The Prognostic and Clinical Value of CD44 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- CD44 and phosphorylated ERK1/2 coexpression predicts distant metastasis in colorectal cancer based on a study of 1137 Saudi patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CD44: A New Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer?Cancers · 2024Review
- Development of novel DNAJB6-KIAA1522-p-mTOR three-protein prognostic prediction models for CRC.Translational oncology · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological significance and prognostic implication of CD44 and its splice variants (v3 and v6) in colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- The Association Between Inflammation, Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness in Colorectal Carcinoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2020Article
- Article
- Angiodrastic Chemokines in Colorectal Cancer: Clinicopathological Correlations.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the prognostic value of E-cadherin, CD44, and MSH2 expression for colorectal cancer (CRC) and construct nomograms that can predict prognosis.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the expression of E-cadherin, CD44, and MSH2 in 223 paraffin-embedded stage II and III CRC specimens using immunohistochemistry in the training cohort. Their prognostic values were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate COX regression models. Moreover, a number of risk factors were used to form nomograms to evaluate survival, and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy. Further validation of the nomograms was performed in an independent cohort of 115 cases.
resultsLow E-cadherin expression and low CD44 expression were significantly associated with diminished overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage II and III CRC patients and patients with negative MSH2 expression had better clinical outcomes. Moreover, the multivariate COX analysis identified E-cadherin, CD44 and MSH2 expression as independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS. Using these three markers and three clinicopathological risk variables, two nomograms were constructed and externally validated for predicting OS and DFS (C-index: training cohort, 0.779 (95% CI 0.722-0.835) and 0.771 (0.720-0.822), respectively; validation cohort, 0.773 (0.709-0.837) and 0.670 (0.594-0.747), respectively).
conclusionThe expression levels of E-cadherin, CD44 and MSH2 were independent prognostic factors for stage II and III CRC patients. By incorporating clinicopathological features and these biomarkers, we have established two nomograms that could be used to make individualized predictions for OS and DFS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.