Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28126210›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2017

Enhanced Risk Aversion, But Not Loss Aversion, in Unmedicated Pathological Anxiety.

Caroline J Charpentier, Jessica Aylward, Jonathan P Roiser, Oliver J Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Understanding anxiety through uncertainty quantification.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Anxiety makes time pass quicker: neural correlates.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Habenula-ventral tegmental area functional coupling and risk aversion in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline J CharpentierInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Affective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: caroline.charpentier1@gmail.com.
Jessica AylwardInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety disorders are associated with disruptions in both emotional processing and decision making. As a result, anxious individuals often make decisions that favor harm avoidance. However, this bias could be driven by enhanced aversion to uncertainty about the decision outcome (e.g., risk) or aversion to negative outcomes (e.g., loss). Distinguishing between these possibilities may provide a better cognitive understanding of anxiety disorders and hence inform treatment strategies.

methodsTo address this question, unmedicated individuals with pathological anxiety (n = 25) and matched healthy control subjects (n = 23) completed a gambling task featuring a decision between a gamble and a safe (certain) option on every trial. Choices on one type of gamble-involving weighing a potential win against a potential loss (mixed)-could be driven by both loss and risk aversion, whereas choices on the other type-featuring only wins (gain only)-were exclusively driven by risk aversion. By fitting a computational prospect theory model to participants' choices, we were able to reliably estimate risk and loss aversion and their respective contribution to gambling decisions.

resultsRelative to healthy control subjects, pathologically anxious participants exhibited enhanced risk aversion but equivalent levels of loss aversion.

conclusionsIndividuals with pathological anxiety demonstrate clear avoidance biases in their decision making. These findings suggest that this may be driven by a reduced propensity to take risks rather than a stronger aversion to losses. This important clarification suggests that psychological interventions for anxiety should focus on reducing risk sensitivity rather than reducing sensitivity to negative outcomes per se.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningRisk-TakingAdultAnxietyCase-Control StudiesDecision MakingFemaleGamblingHumansMaleYoung AdultAnxietyDecision makingEmotionLoss aversionMemoryRisk aversion

Identifiers

PMID28126210
PMCPMC5466268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.