Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28126091›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2016

Accuracy of name and age data provided about network members in a social network study of people who use drugs: implications for constructing sociometric networks.

April M Young, Abby E Rudolph, Amanda E Su, Lee King, Susan Jent, Jennifer R Havens

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using Network and Spatial Data to Better Target Overdose Prevention Strategies in Rural Appalachia.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

April M YoungDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington. Electronic address: april.young@uky.edu.
Abby E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Amanda E SuUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
Lee KingCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Susan JentCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Jennifer R HavensCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington; University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Examining the Impact of the Twin Epidemics of Methamphetamine and Opioid Use on Overdose, Risky Sex and Treatment Engagement among PWUD in Two Rural Appalachian CohortsR01DA033862 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer R Havens · 2012 to 2026
$6.9M
Social networks and HIV risk among rural drug usersR01DA024598 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HAVENS, JENNIFER R · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
HIV and Substance Abuse Epidemiology among IDUs: Structural and Network Risk FactK01DA033879 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RUDOLPH, ABBY ELISE · 2012 to 2016
$877k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA033879NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024598NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNetwork analysis has become increasingly popular in epidemiologic research, but the accuracy of data key to constructing risk networks is largely unknown. Using network data from people who use drugs (PWUDs), the study examined how accurately PWUD reported their network members' (i.e., alters') names and ages.

methodsData were collected from 2008 to 2010 from 503 PWUD residing in rural Appalachia. Network ties (n = 897) involved recent (past 6 months) sex, drug cousage, and/or social support. Participants provided alters' names, ages, and relationship-level characteristics; these data were cross-referenced to that of other participants to identify participant-participant relationships and to determine the accuracy of reported ages (years) and names (binary).

resultsParticipants gave alters' exact names and ages within two years in 75% and 79% of relationships, respectively. Accurate name was more common in relationships that were reciprocally reported and those involving social support and male alters. Age was more accurate in reciprocal ties and those characterized by kinship, sexual partnership, recruitment referral, and financial support, and less accurate for ties with older alters.

conclusionsMost participants reported alters' characteristics accurately, and name accuracy was not significantly different in relationships involving drug-related and/or sexual behavior compared to those not involving these behaviors.

Indexed as

Community NetworksRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorAdultAge FactorsAppalachian RegionEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRural PopulationSensitivity and SpecificitySex FactorsSociometric TechniquesData accuracyDrug abuseHepatitis CHIVIntravenous drug abuseRural healthSelf-reportSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID28126091
PMCPMC5283838
OpenAlexW2527736236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.