Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28126022›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2017

Differences in motivation and adherence to a prescribed assignment after face-to-face and online psychoeducation: an experimental study.

Sven Alfonsson, Karin Johansson, Jonas Uddling, Timo Hursti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02895308 (Differences in Motivation and Adherence to a Prescribed Assignment After Face-to-face and Online Psychoeducation), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02895308 nacompletednot on this map

Differences in Motivation and Adherence to a Prescribed Assignment After Face-to-face and Online Psychoeducation: an Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsBehavioral ProblemsArmsOnline psychoeducation, Face-to-face psychoeducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sven AlfonssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden. sven.alfonsson@pubcare.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-5891
Karin JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, von Kraemers allé, Box 1225, 751 42, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonas UddlingDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, von Kraemers allé, Box 1225, 751 42, Uppsala, Sweden.
Timo HurstiDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, von Kraemers allé, Box 1225, 751 42, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to treatment homework is associated with positive outcomes in behavioral psychotherapy but compliance to assignments is still often moderate. Whether adherence can be predicted by different types of motivation for the task and whether motivation plays different roles in face-to-face compared to online psychotherapy is unknown. If models of motivation, such as Self-determination theory, can be used to predict patients' behavior, it may facilitate further research into homework promotion. The aims of this study were, therefore, to investigate whether motivation variables could predict adherence to a prescribed assignment in face-to-face and online interventions using a psychotherapy analog model.

methodsA total of 100 participants were included in this study and randomized to either a face-to-face or online intervention. Participants in both groups received a psychoeducation session and were given an assignment for the subsequent week. The main outcome measurements were self-reported motivation and adherence to the assignment.

resultsParticipant in the face-to-face condition reported significantly higher levels of motivation and showed higher levels of adherence compared to participants in the online condition. Adherence to the assignment was positively associated with intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility in the whole sample and especially in the online group.

conclusionsThis study shows that intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility are strong predictors of adherence to assignments, especially in online interventions. The results indicate that intrinsic motivation may be partly substituted with face-to-face contact with a therapist. It may also be possible to identify patients with low motivation in online interventions who are at risk of dropping out. Methods for making online interventions more intrinsically motivating without increasing external pressure are needed.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02895308 . Retrospectively registered 30 August 2016.

Indexed as

Health EducationMotivationPatient ComplianceAdultBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMaleYoung AdultAdherenceHomework assignmentsInternetMotivationPsychoeducation

Identifiers

PMID28126022
PMCPMC5270286
OpenAlexW2580967108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.