Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28126014›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2017

Attachment of class B CpG ODN onto DOTAP/DC-chol liposome in nasal vaccine formulations augments antigen-specific immune responses in mice.

Rui Tada, Shoko Muto, Tomoko Iwata, Akira Hidaka, Hiroshi Kiyono, Jun Kunisawa, Yukihiko Aramaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cationic Nanostructures for Vaccines Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rui TadaDepartment of Drug Delivery and Molecular Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan. rui.tada@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-9587
Shoko MutoDepartment of Drug Delivery and Molecular Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan.
Tomoko IwataDepartment of Drug Delivery and Molecular Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan.
Akira HidakaDepartment of Drug Delivery and Molecular Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan.
Hiroshi KiyonoDivision of Mucosal Immunology and International Research and Development Center for Mucosal Vaccines, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun KunisawaDivision of Mucosal Immunology and International Research and Development Center for Mucosal Vaccines, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihiko AramakiDepartment of Drug Delivery and Molecular Biopharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1, Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan. aramaki@toyaku.ac.jp.
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JPNational Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo overcome infectious diseases, the development of mucosal vaccines would be an effective strategy, since mucosal surfaces are the entry site for most pathogens. In general, protein antigens show inherently poor immunogenicity when administered by the mucosal route. Therefore, co-administration of an appropriate mucosal adjuvant is required to exert immune responses toward pathogen-derived antigens effectively. However, the development of a safe and effective mucosal adjuvant system is still challenging. Although, recent studies reported that oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) containing immunostimulatory CpG motifs (CpG ODNs) act as potent mucosal adjuvants and are useful in the formulation of nasal vaccines, there are some disadvantages. For instance, the administration of phosphorothioate (PS)-modified CpG ODNs can induce adverse systemic effects, such as splenomegaly, in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, a reduced dose of CpG ODN might be crucial when used as vaccine adjuvant for clinical purposes. Therefore, we prepared a CpG ODN-loaded cationic liposome, and evaluated its mucosal adjuvant activity.

resultsWe prepared a CpG ODN-loaded DOTAP/DC-chol liposome that was stable during our experiments, by mixing CpG ODNs and liposomes at an N/P ratio of 4. Further, we demonstrated that the attachment of class B CpG ODN to the DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes synergistically enhanced antigen-specific IgA production in the nasal area than that induced by CpG ODN and DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes alone. The endpoint titers were more than tenfolds higher than that induced by either single CpG ODN or single DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes. Additionally, although serum IgG1 responses (indicated as a Th2 response) remained unchanged for DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes and CpG ODN-loaded DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes, the CpG ODN-loaded DOTAP/DC-chol liposomes synergistically induced the production of serum IgG2a (indicated as a Th1 response) than that by the individual liposomes.

conclusionsWe conclude that the advantage of using DOTAP/DC-chol liposome harboring CpG ODN is it induces both antigen-specific mucosal IgA responses and balanced Th1/Th2 responses. Therefore, such a combination enables us to resolve the adverse effects of using CpG ODNs (as a mucosal adjuvant) by reducing the overall dose of CpG ODNs. Further, the biodegradable and essentially non-antigenic nature of the liposomes makes it superior than the other existing mucosal adjuvants.

Indexed as

ImmunityAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigensCholesterolElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFemaleImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GLiposomesMice, Inbred BALB CNasal MucosaOligodeoxyribonucleotidesOvalbuminParticle Size1,2-dioleoyloxy-3-(trimethylammonium)propane3-(N-(N',N'-dimethylaminoethane)carbamoyl)cholesterolAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigensCholesterolCPG-oligonucleotideFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GLiposomesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesOvalbuminQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsVaccinesCationic liposomeCpG ODNIntranasal immunizationMucosal adjuvantVaccine

Identifiers

PMID28126014
PMCPMC5270218
OpenAlexW2582891394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.