Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125763›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2017

Continued Treatment Effect of Zoledronic Acid Dosing Every 12 vs 4 Weeks in Women With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone: The OPTIMIZE-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Catherine Van Poznak, W Graydon Harker, William J Gradishar, Helen Chew, Shaker R Dakhil, Barbara B Haley, Nicholas Sauter, Ramon Mohanlal, Ming Zheng and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00320710 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Stratified, Multi-center, 2-arm Trial of the Continued Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00320710 phase3completednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Stratified, Multi-center, 2-arm Trial of the Continued Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid (Every 4 Weeks vs. Every 12 Weeks) in in the 2nd Year of Treatment in Patients With Documented Bone Metastases From Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2006 to 2013Enrolled416ConditionsBreast CancerArmsZoledronic acid, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Long-term impact of bone-modifying agents for the treatment of bone metastases: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Mechanisms of breast cancer dormancy in bone metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Bridging the gap - Establishing a dental-oncology service in a cancer centre.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriel N HortobagyiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Catherine Van PoznakDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
W Graydon HarkerUtah Cancer Specialists, Salt Lake City, Utah.
William J GradisharDepartment of Medicine-Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Helen ChewDepartment of Internal Medicine-Hematology/Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Shaker R DakhilDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita.
Barbara B HaleyDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Nicholas SauterNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Ramon MohanlalConsultant, AstraZeneca, London, England10Consultant, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York.
Ming ZhengNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Allan LiptonPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceZoledronic acid, a potent bisphosphonate, is commonly administered to patients with bone metastases to reduce the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). However, there have been concerns regarding its long-term monthly administration.

objectiveTo examine whether zoledronic acid every 12 weeks was noninferior to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks in patients with metastatic breast cancer that involved the bone who had previously received a standard dosing regimen of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate disodium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsOPTIMIZE-2 was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 trial of intention-to-treat (full analysis set), evaluable (per protocol), and safety populations. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 4.0 mg of intravenous zoledronic acid every 4 or every 12 weeks with placebo for interim infusions for 1 year. The study was conducted at 102 clinical trial centers in the United States from March 3, 2006, to July 25, 2013. Data analysis was performed from October 7, 2013, to March 24, 2014. The study randomized 416 women (≥18 years old) with bone metastases from breast cancer who previously received 9 or more doses of zoledronic acid and/or pamidronate during the first 10 to 15 months of therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with 1 or more SRE on study (SRE rate). The key secondary end points included time to first SRE and skeletal morbidity rate (SMR).

resultsA total of 416 women were randomized: 200 patients received zoledronic acid every 4 weeks (mean [SD] age, 59.2 [11.1] years; 173 were white [86.5%]), 203 patients received zoledronic acid every 12 weeks (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [11.2] years; 178 were white [87.7%]), and 13 patients received placebo (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [12.2] years; 13 were white [100%]). Baseline characteristics were similar in both zoledronic acid treatment arms. After 1 year of follow-up, SREs occurred in 44 patients (22.0%) in the zoledronic acid every 4 weeks group and 47 patients (23.2%) in the zoledronic acid every 12 weeks group (proportional difference of -1.2%; 1-sided 97.5% CI bound of the difference in SRE rate between arms, -9.8%; noninferiority P = .02). The time to first SRE between treatment groups was not statistically significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.70-1.60; P = .79). The mean (SD) SMR was 0.46 (1.06) vs 0.50 (1.50) events per year in the every 4 weeks vs every 12 weeks groups (P = .85). The safety profiles of the every 4 weeks and every 12 weeks groups were comparable, with 189 patients (95.5%) in the every 4 weeks group having at least 1 adverse event compared with 189 (93.5%) in the every 12 weeks group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The every 12 weeks regimen of zoledronic acid was noninferior to the every 4 weeks regimen for the proportion of patients experiencing 1 or more SRE. These results may have a substantial influence on current clinical practice for treatment of patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00320710.

Indexed as

AgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDiphosphonatesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFractures, SpontaneousHumansImidazolesMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesImidazolesZoledronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID28125763
PMCPMC5824238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.