Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125729›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Association of Serum MiR-142-3p and MiR-101-3p Levels with Acute Cellular Rejection after Heart Transplantation.

Ihdina Sukma Dewi, Zsuzsanna Hollander, Karen K Lam, Janet-Wilson McManus, Scott J Tebbutt, Raymond T Ng, Paul A Keown, Robert W McMaster, Bruce M McManus, Olof Gidlöf and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03575910 (HEARTBiT), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03575910 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

HEARTBiT: A Novel Multi-Marker Blood Test for Management of Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2026Enrolled196ConditionsHeart Transplant Failure and Rejection, Heart Failure, Heart Diseases, Heart Failure,Congestive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Circulating T cell specific extracellular vesicle profiles in cardiac allograft acute cellular rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Liquid Biopsy, a Potential New Detection Method in Heart Allograft Rejection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ihdina Sukma DewiDepartment of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Zsuzsanna HollanderPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, Canada.
Karen K LamPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, Canada.
Janet-Wilson McManusnetCAD, Canadian Blood Services, Vancouver, Canada.
Scott J TebbuttPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, Canada.
Raymond T NgPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, Canada.
Paul A KeownVancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Robert W McMasterVancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Bruce M McManusPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence, Vancouver, Canada.
Olof GidlöfDepartment of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jenny ÖhmanDepartment of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying non-invasive and reliable blood-derived biomarkers for early detection of acute cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients is of great importance in clinical practice. MicroRNAs are small molecules found to be stable in serum and their expression patterns reflect both physiological and underlying pathological conditions in human.

methodsWe compared a group of heart transplant recipients with histologically-verified acute cellular rejection (ACR, n = 26) with a control group of heart transplant recipients without allograft rejection (NR, n = 37) by assessing the levels of a select set of microRNAs in serum specimens.

resultsThe levels of seven microRNAs, miR-142-3p, miR-101-3p, miR-424-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR-144-3p, miR-339-3p and miR-326 were significantly higher in ACR group compared to the control group and could discriminate between patients with and without allograft rejection. MiR-142-3p and miR-101-3p had the best diagnostic test performance among the microRNAs tested. Serum levels of miR-142-3p and miR-101-3p were independent of calcineurin inhibitor levels, as measured by tacrolimus and cyclosporin; kidney function, as measured by creatinine level, and general inflammation state, as measured by CRP level.

conclusionThis study demonstrated two microRNAs, miR-142-3p and miR-101-3p, that could be relevant as non-invasive diagnostic tools for identifying heart transplant patients with acute cellular rejection.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinCreatinineCyclosporineFemaleGene Expression RegulationGraft RejectionHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedSignal TransductionAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkersCABIN1 protein, humanC-Reactive ProteinCreatinineCyclosporineMicroRNAsMIRN101 microRNA, humanMIRN142 microRNA, humanTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID28125729
PMCPMC5268768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.