Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Digital PCR Improves Mutation Analysis in Pancreas Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens.

Shonan Sho, Colin M Court, Stephen Kim, David R Braxton, Shuang Hou, V Raman Muthusamy, Rabindra R Watson, Alireza Sedarat, Hsian-Rong Tseng, James S Tomlinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular alterations in pancreatic tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  7. Personalized oncology and BRAFJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Label-Free Detection of DNA Mutations by Nanopore Analysis.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shonan ShoDepartment of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-6402
Colin M CourtDepartment of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Stephen KimUCLA Center for Pancreatic Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
David R BraxtonDepartment of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Shuang HouDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
V Raman MuthusamyUCLA Center for Pancreatic Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rabindra R WatsonUCLA Center for Pancreatic Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Alireza SedaratUCLA Center for Pancreatic Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Hsian-Rong TsengDepartment of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
James S TomlinsonDepartment of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Thermoresponsive NanoVelcro CTC Purification System for Prostate Cancer ProfilingU01CA198900 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI POSADAS, EDWIN MELENCIO, TSENG, HSIAN-RONG · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
CTC Purification System Based on Thermoresponsive NanoSubstratesR44CA180482 · NCI · CYTOLUMINA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, INC · PI LIU, SEAN XIAO, TSENG, HSIAN-RONG · 2015 to 2016
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA180482NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Applications of precision oncology strategies rely on accurate tumor genotyping from clinically available specimens. Fine needle aspirations (FNA) are frequently obtained in cancer management and often represent the only source of tumor tissues for patients with metastatic or locally advanced diseases. However, FNAs obtained from pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are often limited in cellularity and/or tumor cell purity, precluding accurate tumor genotyping in many cases. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a technology with exceptional sensitivity and low DNA template requirement, characteristics that are necessary for analyzing PDAC FNA samples. In the current study, we sought to evaluate dPCR as a mutation analysis tool for pancreas FNA specimens. To this end, we analyzed alterations in the KRAS gene in pancreas FNAs using dPCR. The sensitivity of dPCR mutation analysis was first determined using serial dilution cell spiking studies. Single-cell laser-microdissection (LMD) was then utilized to identify the minimal number of tumor cells needed for mutation detection. Lastly, dPCR mutation analysis was performed on 44 pancreas FNAs (34 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and 10 fresh (non-fixed)), including samples highly limited in cellularity (100 cells) and tumor cell purity (1%). We found dPCR to detect mutations with allele frequencies as low as 0.17%. Additionally, a single tumor cell could be detected within an abundance of normal cells. Using clinical FNA samples, dPCR mutation analysis was successful in all preoperative FNA biopsies tested, and its accuracy was confirmed via comparison with resected tumor specimens. Moreover, dPCR revealed additional KRAS mutations representing minor subclones within a tumor that were not detected by the current clinical gold standard method of Sanger sequencing. In conclusion, dPCR performs sensitive and accurate mutation analysis in pancreas FNAs, detecting not only the dominant mutation subtype, but also the additional rare mutation subtypes representing tumor heterogeneity.

Indexed as

MutationBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisGenotypeHumansPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Sensitivity and SpecificityKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID28125707
PMCPMC5268428
OpenAlexW2581943548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.