ArticlePloS one2017
Text Authorship Identified Using the Dynamics of Word Co-Occurrence Networks.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Punctuation Patterns inEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging word embeddings to enhance co-occurrence networks: A statistical analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- A complex network approach to analyse pre-trained language models for ancient Chinese.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Emotional profiling and cognitive networks unravel how mainstream and alternative press framed AstraZeneca, Pfizer and COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- SeBioGraph: Semi-supervised Deep Learning for the Graph via Sustainable Knowledge Transfer.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- A two level learning model for authorship authentication.PloS one · 2021Article
- Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media.PeerJ. Computer science · 2020Article
- Network motifs for translator stylometry identification.PloS one · 2019Article
- Evaluating named entity recognition tools for extracting social networks from novels.PeerJ. Computer science · 2019Article
- Forma mentis networks quantify crucial differences in STEM perception between students and experts.PloS one · 2019Article
- How does language change as a lexical network? An investigation based on written Chinese word co-occurrence networks.PloS one · 2018Article
- Co-occurrence simplicial complexes in mathematics: identifying the holes of knowledge.Applied network science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automatic identification of authorship in disputed documents has benefited from complex network theory as this approach does not require human expertise or detailed semantic knowledge. Networks modeling entire books can be used to discriminate texts from different sources and understand network growth mechanisms, but only a few studies have probed the suitability of networks in modeling small chunks of text to grasp stylistic features. In this study, we introduce a methodology based on the dynamics of word co-occurrence networks representing written texts to classify a corpus of 80 texts by 8 authors. The texts were divided into sections with equal number of linguistic tokens, from which time series were created for 12 topological metrics. Since 73% of all series were stationary (ARIMA(p, 0, q)) and the remaining were integrable of first order (ARIMA(p, 1, q)), probability distributions could be obtained for the global network metrics. The metrics exhibit bell-shaped non-Gaussian distributions, and therefore distribution moments were used as learning attributes. With an optimized supervised learning procedure based on a nonlinear transformation performed by Isomap, 71 out of 80 texts were correctly classified using the K-nearest neighbors algorithm, i.e. a remarkable 88.75% author matching success rate was achieved. Hence, purely dynamic fluctuations in network metrics can characterize authorship, thus paving the way for a robust description of large texts in terms of small evolving networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.