Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125699›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Uptake and Acceptability of Oral HIV Self-Testing among Community Pharmacy Clients in Kenya: A Feasibility Study.

Peter M Mugo, Murugi Micheni, Jimmy Shangala, Mohamed H Hussein, Susan M Graham, Tobias F Rinke de Wit, Eduard J Sanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter M MugoKemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1808-3292
Murugi MicheniKemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Jimmy ShangalaKemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Mohamed H HusseinMinistry of Health, Mombasa, Kenya.
Susan M GrahamKemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Tobias F Rinke de WitUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eduard J SandersKemri-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

Funding

Provider and Peer Support Intervention to Improve ART Adherence among Kenyan MenR34MH099946 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRAHAM, SUSAN MARIE · 2013 to 2015
$627k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099946Wellcome Trust 077092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile HIV testing and counselling is a key entry point for treatment as prevention, over half of HIV-infected adults in Kenya are unaware they are infected. Offering HIV self-testing (HST) at community pharmacies may enhance detection of undiagnosed infections. We assessed the feasibility of pharmacy-based HST in Coastal Kenya.

methodsStaff at five pharmacies, supported by on-site research assistants, recruited adult clients (≥18 years) seeking services indicative of HIV risk. Participants were offered oral HST kits (OraQuick®) at US$1 per test. Within one week of buying a test, participants were contacted for post-test data collection and counselling. The primary outcome was test uptake, defined as the proportion of invited clients who bought tests. Views of participating pharmacy staff were solicited in feedback sessions during and after the study.

resultsBetween November 2015 and April 2016, 463 clients were invited to participate; 174 (38%) were enrolled; and 161 (35% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 31-39%]) bought a test. Uptake was higher among clients seeking HIV testing compared to those seeking other services (84% vs. 11%, adjusted risk ratio 6.9 [95% CI 4.9-9.8]). Only 4% of non-testers (11/302) stated inability to pay as the reason they did not take up the test. All but one tester reported the process was easy (29%) or very easy (70%). Demand for HST kits persisted after the study and participating service providers expressed interest in continuing to offer the service.

conclusionsPharmacy HST is feasible in Kenya and may be in high demand. The uptake pattern observed suggests that a client-initiated approach is more feasible compared to pharmacy-initiated testing. Price is unlikely to be a barrier if set at about US$1 per test. Further implementation research is required to assess uptake, yield, and linkage to care on a larger scale.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCounselingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMass ScreeningPersonal Health ServicesPharmaceutical ServicesPharmaciesSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID28125699
PMCPMC5268447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.