Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125613›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Diffusion and Binding of Mismatch Repair Protein, MSH2, in Breast Cancer Cells at Different Stages of Neoplastic Transformation.

Justin Sigley, John Jarzen, Karin Scarpinato, Martin Guthold, Tracey Pu, Daniel Nelli, Josiah Low, Keith Bonin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justin SigleyDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
John JarzenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Karin ScarpinatoOVPR, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Martin GutholdDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tracey PuDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel NelliDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Josiah LowDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
Keith BoninDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-823X
Wake Forest University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interior of cells is a highly complex medium, containing numerous organelles, a matrix of different fibers and a viscous, aqueous fluid of proteins and small molecules. The interior of cells is also a highly dynamic medium, in which many components move, either by active transport or passive diffusion. The mobility and localization of proteins inside cells can provide important insights into protein function and also general cellular properties, such as viscosity. Neoplastic transformation affects numerous cellular properties, and our goal was to investigate the diffusional and binding behavior of the important mismatch repair (MMR) protein MSH2 in live human cells at various stages of neoplastic transformation. Toward this end, noncancerous, immortal, tumorigenic, and metastatic mammary epithelial cells were transfected with EGFP and EGFP-tagged MSH2. MSH2 forms two MMR proteins (MutSα and MutSβ) and we assume MSH2 is in the complex MutSα, though our results are similar in either case. Unlike the MutS complexes that bind to nuclear DNA, EGFP diffuses freely. EGFP and MutSα-EGFP diffusion coefficients were determined in the cytoplasm and nucleus of each cell type using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Diffusion coefficients were 14-24 μm2/s for EGFP and 3-7 μm2/s for MutSα-EGFP. EGFP diffusion increased in going from noncancerous to immortal cells, indicating a decrease in viscosity, with smaller changes in subsequent stages. MutSα produces an effective diffusion coefficient that, coupled with the free EGFP diffusion measurements, can be used to extract a pure diffusion coefficient and a pseudo-equilibrium constant K*. The MutSα nuclear K* increased sixfold in the first stage of cancer and then decreased in the more advanced stages. The ratio of nuclear to cytoplasmic K*for MutSα increased almost two orders of magnitude in going from noncancerous to immortal cells, suggesting that this quantity may be a sensitive metric for recognizing the onset of cancer.

Indexed as

Base Pair MismatchBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell NucleusCell Transformation, NeoplasticCytoplasmDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMutS Homolog 2 ProteinProtein BindingProtein TransportMSH2 protein, humanMutS Homolog 2 Protein

Identifiers

PMID28125613
PMCPMC5268495
OpenAlexW2583044762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.