Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125396›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

Current insights into LMNA cardiomyopathies: Existing models and missing LINCs.

Daniel Brayson, Catherine M Shanahan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cardiac phenotypes in LMNA mutations.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  3. AFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epigenetics inCells · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Braysona King's College London, The James Black Centre , London , United Kingdom.
Catherine M Shanahana King's College London, The James Black Centre , London , United Kingdom.
King's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/93/31834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear lamina is a critical structural domain for the maintenance of genomic stability and whole-cell mechanics. Mutations in the LMNA gene, which encodes nuclear A-type lamins lead to the disruption of these key cellular functions, resulting in a number of devastating diseases known as laminopathies. Cardiomyopathy is a common laminopathy and is highly penetrant with poor prognosis. To date, cell mechanical instability and dysregulation of gene expression have been proposed as the main mechanisms driving cardiac dysfunction, and indeed discoveries in these areas have provided some promising leads in terms of therapeutics. However, important questions remain unanswered regarding the role of lamin A dysfunction in the heart, including a potential role for the toxicity of lamin A precursors in LMNA cardiomyopathy, which has yet to be rigorously investigated.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiomyopathiesDisease Models, AnimalHeart Conduction SystemHumansLamin Type AMutationLamin Type ALMNA protein, humancardiomyocytecardiomyopathyLINC complexLMNAmechanotransductionnuclear laminaprelamin A

Identifiers

PMID28125396
PMCPMC5287098
OpenAlexW2581780532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.