Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28125098›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

Assessment of human milk composition using mid-infrared analyzers requires calibration adjustment.

R Buffin, E Decullier, V De Halleux, C-M Loys, S Hays, F Studzinsky, E Jourdes, J Rigo, J-C Picaud

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of macronutrient content in human milk measured by mid-infrared human milk analyzer and reference methods.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Transmission infrared spectroscopy for rapid quantification of fat, protein, and lactose concentrations in human milk.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

R BuffinHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
E DecullierHospices Civils de Lyon, Pole IMER, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Lyon, France.
V De HalleuxDepartment of Neonatology, CHR de la Citadelle, Liège, Belgium.
C-M LoysHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
S HaysHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
F StudzinskyDepartment of Neonatology, CHR de la Citadelle, Liège, Belgium.
E JourdesHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
J RigoDepartment of Neonatology, CHR de la Citadelle, Liège, Belgium.
J-C PicaudHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
Centre hospitalier régional de la Citadelle · BEHôpital Lyon Sud · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Rhône-Alpes · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNutrient composition of human milk (HM) is highly variable. Targeted HM fortification has been proposed to address these variations and reduce the cumulative nutritional deficit in preterm infants. Near-infrared analysis is used to measure the protein and fat content in HM; however, the reliability of this technique has not been evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of two generations of HM analyzers (HMA1 and HMA2) in estimating protein and lipid contents. STUDY

designReproducibility was assessed by analyzing in duplicate 146 and 128 HM samples with HMA1 and HMA2 (Miris), respectively. To evaluate the accuracy, lipid and protein concentrations were assessed in 31 and 39 samples using HMA1 or HMA2, respectively. Values were compared with measurements obtained using reference methods and correction equations were calculated. After applying the correction equations on 12 HM samples, the performance of the two devices were compared and the equation was validated according to the reference methods.

resultsThe coefficients of variation for protein and lipid assessments were below 3% for both HMA1 and HMA2. Protein concentrations were significantly underestimated by HMA2 (-0.53±0.23 g dl

conclusionHMAs require calibration adjustment before their use in clinical practice, to avoid inappropriate HM fortification.

Indexed as

CalibrationDietary FatsFranceHumansLinear ModelsMilk, HumanMilk ProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredDietary FatsMilk Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28125098
OpenAlexW2580544245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.