Observational studyNutrients2017
Food Choice Motives When Purchasing in Organic and Conventional Consumer Clusters: Focus on Sustainable Concerns (The NutriNet-Santé Cohort Study).
Observational study in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Longitudinal changes in motivational determinants of sustainable diets during a pilot blended digital behavior change intervention: A mixed methods study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Review
- Typology of out-of-home eaters: a description of sociodemographic, lifestyle, nutritional and environmental characteristics in the NutriNet-Santé cohort.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- The association between consideration of future consequences and food intake is mediated by food choice motives in a French adult population.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- Organic Vegetable Chips: Exploring Romanian Consumers' Preferences in Relation to Socio-Demographic Factors.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Associations between measures of socio-economic position and sustainable dietary patterns in the NutriNet-Santé study.Public health nutrition · 2023Article
- Impact of Grass Pea Sweet Miso Incorporation in Vegan Emulsions: Rheological, Nutritional and Bioactive Properties.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Sustainable choices of plant-based ('super') foods: examining the consumption patterns of German consumers on avocados.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Green-Labelled Rice versus Conventional Rice: Perception and Emotion of Chinese Consumers Based on Review Mining.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Organic food consumption is associated with a healthy lifestyle, socio-demographics and dietary habits: a cross-sectional study based on the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Nutrition Practices among Adult Cancer Survivors Living on the Island of Ireland: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Are recent dietary changes observed in the NutriNet-Santé participants healthier and more sustainable?European journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Key Findings of the French BioNutriNet Project on Organic Food-Based Diets: Description, Determinants, and Relationships to Health and the Environment.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- In the Labyrinth of Dietary Patterns and Well-Being-When Eating Healthy Is Not Enough to Be Well.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Short- and Mid-Term Impacts of COVID-19 Outbreak on the Nutritional Quality and Environmental Impact of Diet.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- The role of information in consumer preferences for sustainable certified palm oil products in Germany.PloS one · 2022Article
- Conceptual Models of Food Choice: Influential Factors Related to Foods, Individual Differences, and Society.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Organic Consumer Choices for Nutrient Labels on Dried Strawberries among Different Health Attitude Segments in Norway, Romania, and Turkey.Nutrients · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine food choice motives associated with various organic and conventional dietary patterns among 22,366 participants of the NutriNet-Santé study. Dietary intakes were estimated using a food frequency questionnaire. Food choice motives were assessed using a validated 63-item-questionnaire gathered into nine food choice motive dimension scores: "absence of contaminants", "avoidance for environmental reasons", "ethics and environment", "taste", "innovation", "local and traditional production", "price", "health" and "convenience". Five consumers' clusters were identified: "standard conventional food small eaters", "unhealthy conventional food big eaters", "standard organic food small eaters", "green organic food eaters" and "hedonist moderate organic food eaters". Relationships between food choice motive dimension scores and consumers' clusters were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models adjusted for sociodemographic factors. "Green organic food eaters" had the highest mean score for the "health" dimension, while "unhealthy conventional food big eaters" obtained the lowest mean score for the "absence of contaminants" dimension. "Standard organic food small eaters", "green organic food eaters" and "hedonist moderate organic food eaters" had comparable scores for the "taste" dimension. "Unhealthy conventional food big eaters" had the highest mean score for the "price" dimension while "green organic food eaters" had the lowest mean scores for the "innovation" and "convenience" dimensions. These results provide new insights into the food choice motives of diverse consumers' profiles including "green" and "hedonist" eaters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.