Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28124549›Full record

ReviewThe quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...2017

Radiolabeled inorganic nanoparticles for positron emission tomography imaging of cancer: an overview.

Rubel Chakravarty, Shreya Goel, Ashutosh Dash, Weibo Cai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of..., 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Protein-functionalized and intrinsically radiolabeled [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Brachytherapy at the nanoscale with protein functionalized and intrinsically radiolabeled [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Preclinical PET and MR Evaluation ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Brief update on endocytosis of nanomedicines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rubel ChakravartyRadiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India - rubelc@barc.gov.in.
Shreya GoelMaterials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Ashutosh DashRadiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Weibo CaiMaterials Science Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Novel Combination Therapy for Prostate CancerR01CA169365 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAI, WEIBO · 2013 to 2015
$903k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few years, a plethora of radiolabeled inorganic nanoparticles have been developed and evaluated for their potential use as probes in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of a wide variety of cancers. Inorganic nanoparticles represent an emerging paradigm in molecular imaging probe design, allowing the incorporation of various imaging modalities, targeting ligands, and therapeutic payloads into a single vector. A major challenge in this endeavor is to develop disease-specific nanoparticles with facile and robust radiolabeling strategies. Also, the radiolabeled nanoparticles should demonstrate adequate in vitro and in vivo stability, enhanced sensitivity for detection of disease at an early stage, optimized in vivo pharmacokinetics for reduced non-specific organ uptake, and improved targeting for achieving high efficacy. Owing to these challenges and other technological and regulatory issues, only a single radiolabeled nanoparticle formulation, namely "C-dots" (Cornell dots), has found its way into clinical trials thus far. This review describes the available options for radiolabeling of nanoparticles and summarizes the recent developments in PET imaging of cancer in preclinical and clinical settings using radiolabeled nanoparticles as probes. The key considerations toward clinical translation of these novel PET imaging probes are discussed, which will be beneficial for advancement of the field.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAnimalsHumansMolecular ImagingNeoplasmsTheranostic NanomedicineRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID28124549
PMCPMC5477426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.